@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 6 months agoCyberpunk 2077 director thanks fans as the game hits a 95% positive review rating on Steamwww.eurogamer.netexternal-linkmessage-square127arrow-up1673arrow-down126 cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1647arrow-down1external-linkCyberpunk 2077 director thanks fans as the game hits a 95% positive review rating on Steamwww.eurogamer.net@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 6 months agomessage-square127 cross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareMrScottyTaylinkfedilinkEnglish13•edit-26 months agoI remember hearing even some high specced pcs were having issues and you had to essentially be lucky that you had a configuration that they had the time to optimise for. Just having the best gpu wasn’t enough, for example
minus-squarehswolflinkfedilinkEnglish-1•6 months agothats was just a loud minority talking about super max setting with Raytracing and 4k
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•6 months agoWeren’t they specifically advertising for that? The criticism is valid if they were.
minus-squarehswolflinkfedilinkEnglish-1•6 months agoNot that I remember, true that it didn’t handle the last gen consoles, and that it was marketed as quite demanding Sadly “minimum” or “recommended” just tells us the game runs, not that it runs well
minus-squareMrScottyTaylinkfedilinkEnglish4•6 months agoRecommended is absolutely meant to be “the game runs well on this” not just it runs
minus-squarehswolflinkfedilinkEnglish1•6 months agoThe thing is what is the consensus of “runs well”? Is it a FPS constant? No glitches? Fast loads? My point is, a game can come shitty and run a constant 30 fps under the “recommended” since that’s what they thought was appropriate Is a gray area that should be more descriptive, not sure why downvote me
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•6 months agoI had a decent AMD card which ran it very well, but still had a bunch of artifacts like Judy’s head blocking reflections for the whole lake.
I remember hearing even some high specced pcs were having issues and you had to essentially be lucky that you had a configuration that they had the time to optimise for. Just having the best gpu wasn’t enough, for example
thats was just a loud minority talking about super max setting with Raytracing and 4k
Weren’t they specifically advertising for that? The criticism is valid if they were.
Not that I remember, true that it didn’t handle the last gen consoles, and that it was marketed as quite demanding
Sadly “minimum” or “recommended” just tells us the game runs, not that it runs well
Recommended is absolutely meant to be “the game runs well on this” not just it runs
The thing is what is the consensus of “runs well”? Is it a FPS constant? No glitches? Fast loads?
My point is, a game can come shitty and run a constant 30 fps under the “recommended” since that’s what they thought was appropriate
Is a gray area that should be more descriptive, not sure why downvote me
I had a decent AMD card which ran it very well, but still had a bunch of artifacts like Judy’s head blocking reflections for the whole lake.