“b-but bears are actually dangerous!” Shut the hell up.

  • @[email protected]
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1022 months ago

    Indeed. It strikes me as pointlessly gendered. All people, safety is more important than feelings.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -62 months ago

          Even then it’s contradictory. Men wouldn’t be upset about being chosen over a bear and women wouldn’t be safe if the bear was chosen, so in that specific context it’s nonsensical.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -52 months ago

            Most bears don’t seek out and attack women, but many men do. One of those happens far more often than the other, and you’re either uninformed or willfully ignorant about that fact.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              82 months ago

              Yet another exhibit of people not knowing anything about bears. If bears and women had anywhere near the same amount of interactions as men and women, maulings would be up by a percentage with an alarming number of zeroes. This is like the literal equivalent to the Face Eating Leopard Party supporters being surprised that the Leopards are eating their faces.

      • Draconic NEO
        link
        fedilink
        22 months ago

        Yeah this meme as well as the original bear one were meant to be divisive and make people angry. That’s the point of these kinds of memes, they’re not really meant to be intelligent, they’re meant to stir up drama and make people fight.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      you know what else is pointlessly gendered? the patriarchy

      feminist messaging has to be gendered because the patriarchy is a gender issue.

      that said, feminism is for everybody. liberating women from oppressive structures by nature does the same for men.

      • @[email protected]
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        If it’s not gendered and is for everybody, that isn’t that just the original statement? That safety is for everybody? That seems rather circular.

        But I think I get what you’re saying. We focus on lifting up women, and everyone benefits.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 months ago

          yeah i see how my comment was a little confusing let me try to edit :p thanks for the good faith question tho

          • @[email protected]
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 months ago

            Hey no worries. More people should act in good faith in my opinion. We don’t even have to agree with everyone but we should have mutual respect for each other and want a better world.

    • pewter
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      142 months ago

      If this weren’t gendered I’m not sure I would connect that this was posted as result of people’s reaction to the bears vs men thing.