mommykink to Lemmy [email protected]English • 4 months agoCumlemmy.worldimagemessage-square30arrow-up1395arrow-down124
arrow-up1371arrow-down1imageCumlemmy.worldmommykink to Lemmy [email protected]English • 4 months agomessage-square30
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink12•4 months agoI though it was post hoc, ergo propter hoc? After the fact, therefore because of the fact?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•edit-24 months agoYeah, that’s what I mean. The person I was responding to was comparing it to cum hoc which means that the two events being considered simultaneously, which I don’t think is correct.
I though it was post hoc, ergo propter hoc? After the fact, therefore because of the fact?
Yeah, that’s what I mean.
The person I was responding to was comparing it to cum hoc which means that the two events being considered simultaneously, which I don’t think is correct.
deleted by creator