I mean, there might be a secret AI technology that is so advanced to the point that it can mimic a real human, make posts and comments that looks like its written by a human and even intentionally doing speling mistakes to simulate human errors. How do we know that such AI hasn’t already infiltrated the internet and everything that you see is posted by this AI? If such AI actually exists, it’s probably so advanced that it almost never fails barring rare situations where there is an unexpected errrrrrrrrrorrrrrrrrrrr…

[Error: The program “Human_Simulation_AI” is unresponsive]

      • Basilisk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        The last time I took the blue pill I didn’t care if it was a bot or not, I wanted to fuck it.

    • Maharashtra
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -31 year ago

      Because such a massive simulation without players serves no purpose that’d justify the waste of the resources needed to run it.

        • speck
          link
          fedilink
          41 year ago

          I saw a movie or, probably, an anime with this theme in the last year. People discover they are a simulation, manage to breach through to this race that is just lost in viewing virtual space. Wreck shit, go back.

            • speck
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              That wasn’t it. Damn it. I’m trying not to get pulled into figuring this out, but my brain is of the opinion that there’s no better use if my sleep time lol. I’ll see if it comes back to mind

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I prefer The Thirteenth Floor. 1999 scifi noir.

            spoiler

            A person from 1937 finding out their world is a vr simulation in running on a 1999 computer. Then the 1999 people finding out their world is a vr simulator too, running on a 2024 computer.

        • Maharashtra
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          If someone is both capable and willing to spend such massive amount of effort for such an experiment, he already has all the answers the experiment might provide. It’s like thinking NASA would create massive telescope and place it on an orbit, just to point it at Earth and record how cats hunt.

          Same with fun. Whoever possesses enough resources to waste them on “fun” alone, already has the access to way more interesting pleasures. It’s like thinking Jeff Bezos is going to buy a private island and buy a luxury bunker there, for the purpose of torturing cockroaches.

          • catreadingabook
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            It could still theoretically be that our reality is some kind of entertainment. For example, people enjoy playing The Sims. There are still active communities for the older versions even though there are newer, more engaging games out there. And more generally, some people prefer old games even though their computers have like 1000x the processing power needed to run it.

            If the reality we experience is a simulation, it could be for similar motivations, the hardware would be sophisticated but still a user will run whatever they prefer on it.

            • Maharashtra
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              We enjoy watching SIMS and playing video games, because our reality is too bleak and dark. It’s a form of escapism, mostly.

              Civilization that could create and sustain such a massive and complicated simulation as our reality, already knows ways to make the life interesting enough that it makes any form of SIMS-like entertainment obsolete.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I never said any of this might not be true, I just said what if. The experiment idea seems more plausable to me. And why not make an experiment, as you said, if they’re that advanced, making this experiment would be a piece of cake to them, like us making experiments with ants or bees.

            • Maharashtra
              link
              fedilink
              English
              01 year ago

              I simply observed that logic dictates such an experiment obsolete.

              Whoever has all the technology, resources and skills to conduct such a massive test, already has all the answers the experiment might provide. Beings capable of conducting such a test definitely have better questions to answer.

          • olorin99
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            Maybe they’re just mice trying to find the question to life the universe and everything.

            • Maharashtra
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              I know where my towel is, but again: the effort it takes to create and maintain such a simulation belongs to order so high, it no longer cares about such trivialities.

      • I’ve “played” plenty of simulations that are just things that run entirely on their own without a player input aside from the starting parameters. Chiefly being the one aptly named “The Game of Life.”

        • Maharashtra
          link
          fedilink
          English
          01 year ago

          These are highly primitive and limited simulations, that follow basic patterns and can’t evolve much.

          Ours is a reality complicated, vast and chaotic. They can’t be compared.

            • Maharashtra
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              You said you “played” simulations. I pointed out that what you were playing can’t be compared to the complexity of our reality and therefore does not constitute a plausible argument.

              Just for the sake of clarity: I’m not attacking you, it’s just that what we can simulate and observe can’t be used as an argument in discussion concerning our reality. It’s apples & oranges. We operate on entirely different level of complexity to whatever we may simulate.

      • NotAPenguin
        link
        fedilink
        -91 year ago

        If it’s a simulation your imagination and understanding of the world (simulation) is limited and you have no idea how resource intensive it would be to run, perhaps we’re a kids toy for some being

        • Maharashtra
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          Again: the resources, the effort needed to create and sustain such a massive simulation just for fun, belong to civilization of so high advancement, that it renders the idea impossible.

          Beings being able to do it would be able to bypass any stage of infancy or childhood, because it’d be obsolete and pointless for them.

          • We, human beings, can simulate worlds more complicated than the real one. It doesn’t have to be like The Matrix. It could be like Dwarf Fortress. We wouldn’t know if we are the simulation because it would always seem real and complex to us, even if all the creatures running the simulation see are numbers/text.

            • Maharashtra
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              We, human beings, can simulate worlds more complicated than the real one.

              No, we can’t.

              We can’t even simulate less complicated worlds, but so alien that they follow entirely different “natural laws” to our own.

              Dwarf Fortress

              Dwarf Fortress is ridiculously primitive in comparison to our reality.

          • NotAPenguin
            link
            fedilink
            -11
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            …?

            If it’s a simulation all the laws of physics and so on that you’re basing these theories on might not even exist outside the simulation.

            And you have absolutely zero clue what such a being would find interesting or pointless.