Two posts, two different instances, two different sets of comments. Ok, there are pros and cons:

Segmenting the conversation means that different opinions and perspectives have a bigger opportunity to rise to the top in each discussion. That’s good.

There is also a risk of too few different viewpoints being present in one instance or another, making the possibility of an echo chamber forming higher. That’s bad.

I’m not suggesting that there’s a single perfect way to handle it, nothing is that black and white, but maybe there is a chance to do better. Perhaps crossposted content could contain a second link underneath between the body of the post and the comments section that could inform users that an identical post existed on another instance. Perhaps the comment sections could be merged but the user could choose to filter by instance if they wanted to.

  • Spzi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    My biggest issue with crossposts is when people don’t use it, but make new, unlinked posts :-P

    I liked the idea from this comment:

    Show comment sections from all other posts combined in each crosspost. View options:

    • All combined in one
    • Each post on it’s own

    (So for a post with 2 crossposts, there exist 3 posts. The comment section has 3 tabs for each post, and a 4th tab for the combined view.)

    It might make sense to (optionally) normalize comment scores for combined views. How well did this comment fare relative to it’s post and sibling comments?

    Spending 2 minutes on GitHub, I haven’t found a related issue in either lemmy or lemmy-ui.