@[email protected] to [email protected] • edit-25 months agoWith two Boeing whistleblowers dead in one month, either Boeing is actively killing them, or there are enough whistleblowers that this rate of death is not statistically significantmessage-square86arrow-up1722arrow-down130file-text
arrow-up1692arrow-down1message-squareWith two Boeing whistleblowers dead in one month, either Boeing is actively killing them, or there are enough whistleblowers that this rate of death is not statistically significant@[email protected] to [email protected] • edit-25 months agomessage-square86file-text
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish22•5 months agoSample size could also be too low, no?
minus-square@[email protected]OPlinkfedilink7•5 months agoPossibly. We’ll probably see eventually, either through a myriad of deaths, or a lawsuit with a lot of witnesses.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•5 months agoThe second was MRSA/pneumonia. Take off the tinfoil hat…for now anyways. Fuck Boeing, but at least wait until another “suicide”. Also any 2 points make a straight line with an r^2 of 1.000000. You can’t reliably determine anything with that.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•5 months agoAs I said above, any 2 points make a perfect line with an r^2 of 1.0000. You need AT LEAST 3 points haha. Hopefully no one in stats sees this comment.
Sample size could also be too low, no?
Possibly. We’ll probably see eventually, either through a myriad of deaths, or a lawsuit with a lot of witnesses.
The second was MRSA/pneumonia. Take off the tinfoil hat…for now anyways.
Fuck Boeing, but at least wait until another “suicide”.
Also any 2 points make a straight line with an r^2 of 1.000000. You can’t reliably determine anything with that.
n=2 is a terrible sample size
As I said above, any 2 points make a perfect line with an r^2 of 1.0000.
You need AT LEAST 3 points haha. Hopefully no one in stats sees this comment.