@Forester to Lemmy [email protected]English • 2 months agoWe can do all three things at onceimagemessage-square231fedilinkarrow-up1879arrow-down195
arrow-up1784arrow-down1imageWe can do all three things at once@Forester to Lemmy [email protected]English • 2 months agomessage-square231fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink0•2 months agoAgreed, the future generations already have enough problems. Thats why we should invest into stuff that brings solutions and does not create problems.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-1•2 months agoNo, money is the problem. If nuclear wasnt that expensive then sure, go for it.
minus-squareatro_citylinkfedilink0•2 months agoMoney a problem? We have individuals with more money than entire cities and companies with more money than entire nations. Money is not the problem.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•2 months agoYes because nuclear plants are so expensive which means electricity price will go up for the non rich people. Unless of course they use tax money to bring down the cost but that means you still paying with your taxes to make it more affordable.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•edit-22 months agoTax the rich or better yet abolish them completely.
Agreed, the future generations already have enough problems. Thats why we should invest into stuff that brings solutions and does not create problems.
You and your fearmongering is the problem
No, money is the problem. If nuclear wasnt that expensive then sure, go for it.
Money a problem? We have individuals with more money than entire cities and companies with more money than entire nations. Money is not the problem.
Yes because nuclear plants are so expensive which means electricity price will go up for the non rich people. Unless of course they use tax money to bring down the cost but that means you still paying with your taxes to make it more affordable.
Tax the rich or better yet abolish them completely.