As a gay who used to be even pettier, I have hooked up with exboyfriends’ crushes and one exboyfriend’s new boyfriend. Good lord it is easy to get high off of petty revenge.
I’m not taking this personally, don’t project. I’m just amazed how you stubbornly argue against one of the oldest story tropes of all time: the horned, vengeful husband/wife.
Amazing. I’m sorry if this was too complicated for you. Let me repeat:
There is no indication whatsoever that drug dealer guy knew. This has been explained to you a couple of times by other people.
In fact the glaring absence of any indication can be interpreted as: no, drug dealer did not know. This has also been explained.
You, on the other hand, claim the revenge taken out by Anon in itself is proof that he knew. Because a cuckold will never attack the lover unless the lover knew what they were doing.
That would be cool if it were so but it just isn’t. The trope of the cuckold attacking the lover is older than humanity itself. You’ll find stories even (or rather especially) in Greek mythology where cuckolding or just fancying the wrong person leads to eternal punishment. Also by the age of 20 most of us witnessed similar behavior a couple of times. If you didn’t good for you / grey out of the basement more.
You are doing the equivalent of arguing that 1+1 does not equal 2.
It’s pretty heavily implied he knew. Why else would he be angrier at the dealer than his ex?
Where is that implied
The fact that OP wanted revenge on him would imply he thought the drug dealer knew.
That’s just conjecture based on your interpretation.
And?
And it means nothing.
You see that right? Just because you have an interpretation doesn’t make it correct.
So? Neither does yours, you’ve got just as much evidence as me.
Sure, but we also have the consensus from this thread.
Which is more likely, you and however many upvotes you’ve had are correct, or the vastly more people here with the opposing view?
It’s a consensus on Lemmy, which can have a strange view of things at times.
The fact that OP is a robot would imply that he is not mentally well and shouldn’t be trusted
The fuck are you on about?
OP is a user of the 4chan board /r9k/, who go by the demonym “robot.” They are moderately less brain damaged than /b/tards, but only barely so
I thought you were referring to the lack of causality in the original statement 😅
That’s a stretch.
Why else would OP be more mad at the dealer than their ex then?
Pettiness.
I second this so hard
As a gay who used to be even pettier, I have hooked up with exboyfriends’ crushes and one exboyfriend’s new boyfriend. Good lord it is easy to get high off of petty revenge.
Who said more mad? Maybe OP didn’t have evidence against the gf.
Correct, cuckolded men are well known to first ask their wife’s lover if they knew before attacking them. /s
Why are you taking this so personally? Lemmings get mad about the weirdest stuff.
I’m not taking this personally, don’t project. I’m just amazed how you stubbornly argue against one of the oldest story tropes of all time: the horned, vengeful husband/wife.
We’re discussing whether greentext believes the dealer knew it was his GF, I’m not sure how your comment relates to that.
Amazing. I’m sorry if this was too complicated for you. Let me repeat:
There is no indication whatsoever that drug dealer guy knew. This has been explained to you a couple of times by other people.
In fact the glaring absence of any indication can be interpreted as: no, drug dealer did not know. This has also been explained.
You, on the other hand, claim the revenge taken out by Anon in itself is proof that he knew. Because a cuckold will never attack the lover unless the lover knew what they were doing.
That would be cool if it were so but it just isn’t. The trope of the cuckold attacking the lover is older than humanity itself. You’ll find stories even (or rather especially) in Greek mythology where cuckolding or just fancying the wrong person leads to eternal punishment. Also by the age of 20 most of us witnessed similar behavior a couple of times. If you didn’t good for you / grey out of the basement more.
You are doing the equivalent of arguing that 1+1 does not equal 2.
You’re talking a lot, but not really providing any evidence beyond “it’s obvious”.
Why do you care so much about this?