Well if they don’t want to talk then they shouldn’t get a vote.
I’ve seen post that have hundreds of upvotes that say something like let’s talk about x but no replies.
That’s the point of something like lemmy to discuss a topic. It’s not just for downvote or upvotes.
Well if they don’t want to talk then they shouldn’t get a vote.
It’s just my personal opinion, but this seems too exclusionary to me. Just because someone doesn’t want to talk doesn’t mean they don’t want to participate at all, and I don’t think that excluding someone just because they don’t have a specific statement to make will add value. Perversely, it might encourage low-effort commenting (first!) just for access to voting.
Personally, I don’t care about upvotes for downvotes. I suspect the reason you see users declining is because there isn’t much content or interaction. Eventually it will become either a niche or just die off.
I suspect the reason you see users declining is because there isn’t much content or interaction.
I’ve seen quite a few people saying this recently, but it doesn’t match my experience. I’m having more interesting conversations with more people than a year ago, and I see new content every day. Maybe your instance has defederated with too many others?
Eventually it will become either a niche or just die off.
Do you mean lemmy as a whole? I don’t think so, it’s definitely been growing. I think people forget how small reddit was for such a long time. It used to be a joke there that you wouldn’t get new blue links until 8am on the US east coast.
Should be tied to comments. If you don’t comment, you don’t get a vote either way.
Vote comment
The fediverse need more interactions for it to work. Downvoting or upvoting isn’t creating any value.
Comments create value even if you disagree.
I disagree.
Source: I have nothing of value to say.
This point of view is like extroverts forcing introverts to talk when they don’t want to.
Well if they don’t want to talk then they shouldn’t get a vote. I’ve seen post that have hundreds of upvotes that say something like let’s talk about x but no replies.
That’s the point of something like lemmy to discuss a topic. It’s not just for downvote or upvotes.
It’s just my personal opinion, but this seems too exclusionary to me. Just because someone doesn’t want to talk doesn’t mean they don’t want to participate at all, and I don’t think that excluding someone just because they don’t have a specific statement to make will add value. Perversely, it might encourage low-effort commenting (first!) just for access to voting.
It is called social media for a reason.
Personally, I don’t care about upvotes for downvotes. I suspect the reason you see users declining is because there isn’t much content or interaction. Eventually it will become either a niche or just die off.
I’ve seen quite a few people saying this recently, but it doesn’t match my experience. I’m having more interesting conversations with more people than a year ago, and I see new content every day. Maybe your instance has defederated with too many others?
Do you mean lemmy as a whole? I don’t think so, it’s definitely been growing. I think people forget how small reddit was for such a long time. It used to be a joke there that you wouldn’t get new blue links until 8am on the US east coast.
Lemm.ee is great about letting you decide what to filter. I can’t say enough good things about the admin.
It’s been a while since I’ve seen the number, but last I saw, they were trending down on all counts.
But sometimes, something is just so fucking stupid it doesn’t deserve that sort of engagement…