• body_by_make
      link
      fedilink
      102 months ago

      In 2042 you’ll be 62ish or something I don’t wanna think about math, but that’s around the average American life expectancy and isn’t too bad.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Maths understander here, in 2042 they’ll be 60, not 62. Also the average life expectancy in the US is around 77-78 years, i.e. enough of a difference compared to 60 that you could more or less fit (and live to see) a grandkid/great-grandkid’s entire childhood in there.

        Although that 79 years figure is Life Expectancy at Birth, in practice it tends to be longer for most surviving adults older than a certain point, mostly because the lower ranges of the chart hit their allotted moment and pass on for whatever reason, leaving the remaining average higher still

        Of course, with calculus living rent free in my head rn thanks to the uni course of the same name, I’m wondering what that chart of “current age vs expected remaining age” looks like, and where the point of “ageing faster than your remaining likely time grows” lies

        Edit: source turned out to be a little out of date (although they always tend to bicker a little on the exact number), corrected for it

      • htrayl
        link
        fedilink
        32 months ago

        That’s not close to average life expectancy in the US.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 months ago

          Okay, source I used was a little out of date (was looking at 2015 numbers, oops), but even the 2022 numbers disagree somewhat. OECD claims 77, CIA claims 78.