The company’s team clarified that their terms prohibit third-party apps from disabling ads, as it denies creators their due reward for viewership. Although the announcement did not specify any app by name, it’s plausible to presume that third-party YouTube apps such as NewPipe, YouTube ReVanced, Piped, and others might be implicated.

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️
    link
    fedilink
    English
    817 months ago

    YouTube is the only one that doesn’t have an alternative. I mean, there are other video hosts yes, but the content isn’t there.

    The creators need to start moving. Their fans will likely follow, since it’s not YouTube they are there for. But I don’t think anyone else offering free, large scale video hosting does much more, if even that, than what YouTube does. Even if it sucks, it’s better than nothing, so there is no incentive to move for anyone.

    • @xyx@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      317 months ago

      Problem being that there is no real incentive to do so, unless PeerTube finds a way to pay content creators. Until then, switching away from YouTube means loosig their revenue stream…requiring them to take up jobs to pay the bills and eventually have less time for content creation.

      Living on donations and patreon alone is hard…

      • Ignacio
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        unless PeerTube finds a way to pay content creators

        Google is a for-profit organization. Framasoft, which developed PeerTube, is a non-profit one. The only way to pay content creators is when people donate money to PeerTube and then PeerTube share that money with creators. Which is also difficult because there are no trackers to know internally who has more subscribers or which video has more views, etc. Internally as using a tracker, but you have to visit one by one every channel and every video to know its numbers.

    • @Akasazh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      87 months ago

      Nebula is trying to be the alternative. It’s a paid subscription and not as plentiful as YouTube is (and maybe never will be).

      But it’s a good try, give it some support, if you can

    • @conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      67 months ago

      Most of their fans won’t follow. Convenience is a powerful thing.

      There also really aren’t other options. Anyone being able to sign up and host video for free is an extremely expensive service to provide if people take you up on it.

      • @laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        17 months ago

        If enough creators moved, the fans would follow.

        Unfortunately, the creators won’t move to a platform that doesn’t have users to watch them. And users won’t bother with a platform that doesn’t have creators to watch.

        While this can be overcome… Yeah, I think googie will need to fork up yootoob a lot more before enough on both sides are willing to jump ship en masse

        • @conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          17 months ago

          Some fans would follow. If 100% of their subscribed channels moved tomorrow, 90% still wouldn’t move to the new platform for a meaningful length of time.

    • @deleted@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      57 months ago

      I tried Nabula twice. The latest in 2020.

      Service is fine but their UI + search and discover is awful. Like I can barely find creators I like when I search for their exact channel name.

    • @ZeroTwo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17 months ago

      Some of the creators I follow are moving… Kind of. Most of their videos get taken down for some stupid ass reason so they’re going to places like patreon and whatever other platform you have to pay a monthly sub to. Which at that point, I just don’t watch them.