• Scrubbles
    link
    fedilink
    English
    131 year ago

    [Everyone hated that]

    But seriously, we should just start a “non shitty printer company” that just makes… non shitty printers

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      231 year ago

      A few have tried…

      Kodak did this a few years but the big printer companies slashed prices in the printers to next to nothing. Kodaks $200 printer with cheap ink, huge cartridges, and no chips didn’t sell well when Canon would have a similar printer (scan, print, etc) for $49 next to it. Consumers are dumb.

      Brother’s eco tank is close… but if they are killing that off in the name of ink selling greed as this meme suggests…

      • Nate
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        I had a Kodak printer. The first reload I put in it was off brand and it proceeded to immediately brick itself. Refused to recognize any cartridges even the originals.

        Also EcoTank is Epson, super duper recommend. I use to sell printers and I would only sell Brother and Epson.

        If you’ve got any questions about them I still have my Epson contact in my phone

    • @SquishyPandaDev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      But then we can’t make all the money. Won’t some one think of the shareholders for once

      • Scrubbles
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Damn I forgot about that. Shareholders > Customers

    • Possibly linux
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      The thing with printers is that they are very hard to get right. Its not like some startup can just make a printer that printer with the same speed and quality as some of the big brands.

      With that being said I still would back any startup that tries