@[email protected] to The [email protected]English • 6 months agoBring out the rule booklemmy.worldimagemessage-square86arrow-up1799arrow-down120cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1779arrow-down1imageBring out the rule booklemmy.world@[email protected] to The [email protected]English • 6 months agomessage-square86cross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•6 months agohow can an enforcer not become a ruler?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish-1•6 months agoBy not having immunity from equitable rules and by not having the ability to just make shit up and arrest people for it? This isn’t rocket science. Enforcers CAN be subject to rules too, regardless how much US police are not.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish6•6 months agoThat’s delusionally… Both optimistic and pessimistic at the same time?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish-3•edit-26 months agoIt’s only delusional if you assume what kind of enforcer I would approve of.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•6 months agoBut you don’t really get to choose. That’s kind of the point.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish-4•6 months agoNot talking about the real world. Talking about what anarchists would want. Not what they’d get.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•6 months agoYou don’t even understand the premise of what youre talking about and I’m too tired to try explaining to someone who probably doesn’t want to know.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish-1•6 months agoYou all the ones confusing rule makers with rule enforcers, yet you accuse me of not understanding. Stop being so fucking dumb and maybe your claims of me not understanding would have any merit.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•6 months agoAgain, youre so completely missing the point.
how can an enforcer not become a ruler?
By not having immunity from equitable rules and by not having the ability to just make shit up and arrest people for it?
This isn’t rocket science. Enforcers CAN be subject to rules too, regardless how much US police are not.
That’s delusionally… Both optimistic and pessimistic at the same time?
It’s only delusional if you assume what kind of enforcer I would approve of.
But you don’t really get to choose. That’s kind of the point.
Not talking about the real world. Talking about what anarchists would want. Not what they’d get.
You don’t even understand the premise of what youre talking about and I’m too tired to try explaining to someone who probably doesn’t want to know.
You all the ones confusing rule makers with rule enforcers, yet you accuse me of not understanding. Stop being so fucking dumb and maybe your claims of me not understanding would have any merit.
Again, youre so completely missing the point.