• 🇰 🔵 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Because most people don’t need it. They can, and do, totally offer better upload speeds; but you’ll be paying out the ass for it because businesses have a much bigger demand for upload speeds, so you’ll be paying business prices.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      7
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I very much disagree.

      Almost all of our performance issues for work from home users at my office, are on cable ISPs and directly related to limited upload speed.

      For our users, that’s usually because of system incremental backups (and users creating large files, or files that don’t incrementally backup up very well and need to be fully replaced), and poor video call performance.

      You see, a lot of web applications (and even our old VPN itself) uses TCP for communication. This means that every so many packets (which could be as little as 64kb of data), the server needs you to acknowledge that you had received the data before it sends more. If your upload is congested, those acknowledgements get queued behind all the other packets in line. This, in turn, ends up impacting download performance.

      A lot of times it gets exacerbated by a partner/child coming home and instantly uploading a full days worth of videos and photos to iCloud/Google as soon as they get on the wifi.

      Back in the 90s this was true. Internet at home was largely a one-way street. Nowadays with work from home, cloud-syncing apps, self-hosting, and peer-to-peer matchmaking games, among other things…the 6Mbps upload max that most cable ISPs offer is ridiculouslu limiting.