• dogA
    link
    fedilink
    492 years ago

    he pleaded not guilty. and his lawyer said this is “an attack on america”.

    'cause he had boxes of papers he wasn’t supposed to have, that this is an attack on america? yeah, okay 🙄

    • @squid010@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      152 years ago

      This is gonna be wild… the feds hardly ever lose.

      With that, I’m very curious to see the fallout should he be convicted.

    • @bouncing@partizle.com
      link
      fedilink
      82 years ago

      his lawyer said this is “an attack on america”.

      I’m wondering if the lawyers who quit did so because they were too embarrassed to say shit like that in court, despite a certain client’s demands.

      • dogA
        link
        fedilink
        92 years ago

        the lawyers that quit are lawyers who don’t want to perjure themselves, probably 🙃

    • @Spitfire@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      82 years ago

      I work with many people who are so upset over this, calling it injustice and how horrible that we choose to prosecute Trump when we should instead be jailing Hillary, Harris, and Biden.

      I bite my tongue and don’t say anything but it’s so frustrating.

      • @awake01@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        82 years ago

        As far as Hillary goes I am not sure why Trump’s DoJ didn’t hand down an indictment if it had evidence that she ultimately committed a crime? I guess the same is true for Hunter.

        • dogA
          link
          fedilink
          42 years ago

          oh yeah! thank you for saying that :) trump had the doj under his control and still didn’t have enough evidence to indict her. i would think that would shut up the “jail hillary and joe” crowd, but i guess they have super short term memory

        • @GodOfSnails@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          32 years ago

          To my knowledge and I am prefacing this with I could be wrong. In order to charge Hillary for the email incident they would have had to prove either Intent or Gross negligence and when it came down to Hillary I dont think the Doj had anything along the lines of these two factors, whereas trump and they even qoute him, hes talking about how the information is still classified but yada yada this happened, that fills the intent part and then for the gross negligence part they talk about how they found the boxes of files just strewn about everywhere in the club.

          Feel free to correct me, this is just my understanding.

      • dogA
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        same here. i’m all for treating everyone as equal, but i’m pretty sure nothing new came up after hillary was already investigated and iirc biden was slapped on the wrist for not returning some documents. but hey, you know, one box is the same as rooms full of boxes, apparently

        • @Spitfire@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          22 years ago

          The difference seems to me, as far as I know (please correct me if I have missed something) is that Biden and related parties cooperated with getting the documents returned while Trump hid and tried to erase evidence that he had them. And I believe that some have yet to be found, potentially sold off.

          • dogA
            link
            fedilink
            22 years ago

            noice 👌 and i know the news was telling me today, too, that the doj gave trump a chance to return all his documents earlier this year, and he returned, they said, like one box. way to be 👍 what did he think was gonna happen? they just never find the boxes that have become fixtures of his house?

      • @MothBookkeeper@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        I probably shouldn’t, but I let those people know what I think. If they want to bring it up, they can hear what I have to say about it too.