A stark example of how digital footprints will be utilized in a post-Roe America

The article is from Aug 10, 2022 but remains relevant

  • Infiltrated_ad8271
    link
    fedilink
    1
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s probably a waste of time, but okay, I will be kind enough not to delve into your ignorant slander, delusions, straw men and ad hominems.

    Since anti-abortionists don’t consider women as human beings possessing equal human rights (…) A right to life without right to agency is slavery. Do you understand that anti-abortionists want women to be slaves?

    Let us come to the main issue. As I mentioned, this is a difference of importance, not all rights are equal and when there is a conflict one should prevail over the other. Although nothing is written it is easy in some cases, for example, the right not to be tortured is more important than the right to marry.

    If for a moment you are able to consider the premise that fetuses are subjects of rights (say one of 42-week to make it easier), tell me, which is more important, the temporary and partial suspension of the right of agency or the right to life?
    (I do not include slavery because I find it fucking absurd, as well as a trivialization of something very serious. You could have said something more coherent like reproductive freedom.)

    This is not something like seeing the woman as property to be controlled, only considering the rights and interests of “both”. Let us also not forget that it is a self-imposed situation, and the cases in which it is “imposed by third parties” abortion is allowed all over the world.

    • xuxebikoOP
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Thank you for making clear

      1. your utter contempt for women,
      2. your denial of women as human beings with human rights, and
      3. your misconception that you and other anti-abortionists are arbiters of human rights

      ps: How is an unwanted pregnancy is a “self-imposed situation”? Is it your understanding that women are capable of parthenogenesis?

      • Infiltrated_ad8271
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        *Sigh. As I guessed, your reading comprehension is nil and you are not capable of debate or simple mental work, you can only use fallacies. Well, at least I tried.

    • jwiggler
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      Fetus does not have the right to life. It’s not a person, it does not have rights. Simple as that. People have rights, fetus does not.

      • Infiltrated_ad8271
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Aha, we agree, at least until high fetal development and viability.
        However, that’s not my point, and it’s a pity no one bothers to address it.