Python is memory safe? Can’t you access/address memory with C bindings?

  • @Fal
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -18 months ago

    How so? That’s like, the thing that makes rust awesome to write.

    • @vext01@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      18 months ago

      It’s hard to get those kinds of data structures through the borrow checker.

      Try writing a doubly linked list.

      • @Fal
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -38 months ago

        It’s because it’s hard to make them correct. It’s not any harder to write it in rust than in C. Just C lets you do it wrong

        • @vext01@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          18 months ago

          That’s not right.

          Try and write a mutable doubly linked list in Rust and you will find that it’s problematic for the borrow checker.

          Search online and you will find solutions that work around this using ‘RefCell’ (to delegate mutable borrows to runtime), or raw pointers with ‘unsafe’.

          • @calcopiritus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            08 months ago

            Both RefCell and unsafe are features of the language. That’s like saying python’s OOP sucks if you don’t use the class keyword.

            • @vext01@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              18 months ago

              I’m not saying it sucks. I’m saying it can be less straight-forward than conventional languages, even for experienced programmers.

              The borrow checker is fantastic, but there’s no doubt that it requires a new way of thinking if you’ve never seen Rust before.