Ann Archy to [email protected] • 7 months agoBOEING vs NASAlemmy.worldimagemessage-square19arrow-up1234arrow-down18
arrow-up1226arrow-down1imageBOEING vs NASAlemmy.worldAnn Archy to [email protected] • 7 months agomessage-square19
minus-squareHildegardelinkfedilink40•7 months agoWhy are you comparing the budget of one single spacecraft with an entire production run of a model of airplane? That’s not a reasonable comparison.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•7 months agoModern airplanes are also have crazy complicated systems compared to the Apollo program. But also the MAX eas supotti be a quick and easy upgrade to the existing 737-800, so clearly theu fucked up along the way
minus-squareJustinlinkfedilinkEnglish19•7 months agoBecause Boeing should have economy of scale benefits by selling $180B worth of aircraft, while Apollo 13 was a bespoke, single-use, cutting-edge spacecraft on a much smaller budget.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink5•7 months agoWasn’t it exactly the same as most of the other apollo craft?
Why are you comparing the budget of one single spacecraft with an entire production run of a model of airplane? That’s not a reasonable comparison.
deleted by creator
Modern airplanes are also have crazy complicated systems compared to the Apollo program.
But also the MAX eas supotti be a quick and easy upgrade to the existing 737-800, so clearly theu fucked up along the way
Hahahaha! Well nailed!
Because Boeing should have economy of scale benefits by selling $180B worth of aircraft, while Apollo 13 was a bespoke, single-use, cutting-edge spacecraft on a much smaller budget.
Wasn’t it exactly the same as most of the other apollo craft?
Because this is Lemmy