• @Fal
    link
    fedilink
    48 months ago

    I don’t know any educated people who would.

    Hahaha. You don’t know ANYone “educated” that would call someone who intentionally killed someone, but was convicted of a lower crime, a murderer. Ok sure.

    I get you dislike Trump, but banana courts are just damaging to the whole country.

    No one’s talking about a court, we’re talking about casual discourse between civilians. Oh wait, except for the court that found trump responsible for sexual abuse

    • NeuromancerOPM
      link
      fedilink
      -88 months ago

      Hahaha. You don’t know ANYone “educated” that would call someone who intentionally killed someone, but was convicted of a lower crime, a murderer. Ok sure. What lower crime was he convicted of? I am not aware that OJ has been convicted of any crime.

      No one’s talking about a court, we’re talking about casual discourse between civilians. Oh wait, except for the court that found trump responsible for sexual abuse Trump is legally libel for sexual abuse. The jury agreed with the lack of evidence and still came to the conclusion it happened. I don’t deny that at all.

      • @Fal
        link
        fedilink
        38 months ago

        The jury agreed with the lack of evidence and still came to the conclusion it happened. I don’t deny that at all.

        What does this even mean? The jury found him liable for sexual abuse. What crazy mental gymnastics are you doing to suggest that they “agreed with the lack of evidence”?

        • NeuromancerOPM
          link
          fedilink
          -108 months ago

          Any reasonable person with a hint of intelligence would have told her to go pound sand. Basically her evidence was she said it happened. Nothing else.

          There is no way to defend yourself from such insanity.