@[email protected] to Microblog [email protected]English • 7 months agoTwinsiesi.postimg.ccimagemessage-square104arrow-up11.07Karrow-down1106
arrow-up1964arrow-down1imageTwinsiesi.postimg.cc@[email protected] to Microblog [email protected]English • 7 months agomessage-square104
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish-18•7 months agoThe left: wealth is a zero sum game The right: 🤦♂️no, it’s not
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish11•7 months agoSorry I don’t understand. Which policies of the right support what you’re suggesting?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•7 months agoTrickle down economics is based on philosophy that wealth is positive sum
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish-2•7 months agoMy comment is about philosophy, not policy. The idea that rich people are rich because poor people are poor is a leftist idea. It assumes wealth is a finite thing, which must be taken away from one party to accumulate with another.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•7 months agoWealth is finite. By definition. There is a scarcity of resources in the world. A few people have most of it. You’ve been on earth before right?
The left: wealth is a zero sum game
The right: 🤦♂️no, it’s not
Sorry I don’t understand. Which policies of the right support what you’re suggesting?
The imaginary ones.
Trickle down economics is based on philosophy that wealth is positive sum
My comment is about philosophy, not policy.
The idea that rich people are rich because poor people are poor is a leftist idea. It assumes wealth is a finite thing, which must be taken away from one party to accumulate with another.
Wealth is finite. By definition. There is a scarcity of resources in the world. A few people have most of it. You’ve been on earth before right?