@[email protected] to politics @lemmy.world • 2 years agoIllinois judge rules Donald Trump is disqualified from the state's 2024 election ballotwww.usatoday.comexternal-linkmessage-square222arrow-up1938
arrow-up1906external-linkIllinois judge rules Donald Trump is disqualified from the state's 2024 election ballotwww.usatoday.com@[email protected] to politics @lemmy.world • 2 years agomessage-square222
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•edit-22 years agoThe 14th Amendment applies to insurrections, not just wars. Any attempt to stop the function of government by force is an insurrection, including the Whiskey Rebellion, the Civil War, and Jan 6.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•2 years agoSounds good if it is a universally understood insurrection.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•2 years agoInsurrection has a legal definition, and that’s the definition that counts. Judges are the ones responsible for deciding whether a legal definition applies, and so far all those involved said it does.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•2 years agoDo you see the issue with one judge or a couple judges deciding who get to run for office at their whim?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•2 years agoJudges already do a lot more than that, they have the power to decide who lives and dies.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•2 years agoThats fair, but Trump running for office could be a lot bigger than that if it leads to domestic conflict.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•2 years agoJudges generally don’t care if their decisions lead to domestic conflict. Nor should they, that’s how rule of law can succumb to mob rule.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•2 years agoI understand that, but when judges do things like remove people from ballots over accusation, that is obviously a political decision.
Yeah because it was literally a civil war…
The 14th Amendment applies to insurrections, not just wars.
Any attempt to stop the function of government by force is an insurrection, including the Whiskey Rebellion, the Civil War, and Jan 6.
Sounds good if it is a universally understood insurrection.
Insurrection has a legal definition, and that’s the definition that counts.
Judges are the ones responsible for deciding whether a legal definition applies, and so far all those involved said it does.
Do you see the issue with one judge or a couple judges deciding who get to run for office at their whim?
Judges already do a lot more than that, they have the power to decide who lives and dies.
Thats fair, but Trump running for office could be a lot bigger than that if it leads to domestic conflict.
Judges generally don’t care if their decisions lead to domestic conflict. Nor should they, that’s how rule of law can succumb to mob rule.
I understand that, but when judges do things like remove people from ballots over accusation, that is obviously a political decision.