@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 2 years agoThe HDMI Forum rejected AMD's open source HDMI 2.1 implementationwww.gamingonlinux.comexternal-linkmessage-square154arrow-up1863cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1853external-linkThe HDMI Forum rejected AMD's open source HDMI 2.1 implementationwww.gamingonlinux.com@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 2 years agomessage-square154cross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish16•2 years agoIt’s usually easy enough to adapt it as needed. It can typically send signals compatible with HDMI and DVI-D just fine.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish11•2 years agoThe passive adapters that connect to DP++ ports probably still rely on this HDMI specific driver/firmware support for these features.
It’s usually easy enough to adapt it as needed. It can typically send signals compatible with HDMI and DVI-D just fine.
The passive adapters that connect to DP++ ports probably still rely on this HDMI specific driver/firmware support for these features.