The approval rating of the nation’s highest court stands at 40 per cent, according to a new poll

The Supreme Court’s approval rating has plunged to one of its lowest levels yet ahead of a ruling on Donald Trump’s eligibility to run for president.

The approval rating of the nation’s highest court stands at 40 per cent, according to the latest poll released by Marquette Law School on Wednesday.

The latest numbers rival only those of July 2022, when only 38 per cent of US adults said they approved of the Supreme Court and 61 per cent disapproved – just after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v Wade.

  • n1ckn4m3
    link
    fedilink
    239 months ago

    Unfortunately, they could have a 0% approval rating and we’d still never get the 2/3rds majority in congress to do fuckall about it. This supreme court will continue to pander to corporate and donor interests and act wholly without ethics because our system was built on the concept that people in those roles would act with integrity and utterly falls apart when people on the supreme court flagrantly disregard their responsibility to citizens and act in their own interests.

    • FuglyDuck
      link
      fedilink
      English
      229 months ago

      Biden et al should have packed the court when they had the chance.

      • n1ckn4m3
        link
        fedilink
        159 months ago

        Can’t say I disagree. When you fight a cheater by playing 100% by the rules in a world where cheating isn’t punished, you lose every time. This pretty much sums up the last 40 years of the Democratic party.

        • Optional
          link
          fedilink
          69 months ago

          Don’t forget the idiocy of playing as center-right as possible by running the most milquetoast candidates possible. Every time. Still, actually.

          • FuglyDuck
            link
            fedilink
            English
            59 months ago

            and it has been done before. 9 wasn’t the original number of justices, it’s changed

        • the post of tom joad
          link
          fedilink
          19 months ago

          Yes, one starts to wonder after 40 years of it’s not by design. How much does it cost to get a politician not to do something i wonder? Probably pretty cheap since hey, how would you prove it when nothing happened?

          I know I’m just talking shit but i kinda get the feeling after watching them fail for decades that maybe they aren’t the hapless helpless rule of law guys they’d prefer we thought them as. Which is more likely? It just doesn’t pass the smell test

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        29 months ago

        Well, let’s reelect him and see what happens. I don’t think he’ll do it but I’d think it’s more likely when he isn’t worried about Trump winning if the move turns out to be more unpopular than expected.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            29 months ago

            Jeff Jackson of NC but the Republicans were able to gerrymander his district so that he had very little chance of winning a second term in the US House. He’s not quite ready for primetime but watch for him in 10 years or so.

            • FuglyDuck
              link
              fedilink
              English
              29 months ago

              AoC, Bernie. Pelosi (though her husband’s stock trading is a little too… suspicious.) even Michelle Obama might be better.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                19 months ago

                AoC folded many times for stupid things when Nancy Pelosi wanted it (crocodile tears were shed).

                Bernie hasn’t called what is happening in Gaza a genocide- would continue supporting it like Biden more than likely.

                Michele Obama is an unknown but is tainted by Barack Obama’s legacy (drone strikes) and anti-constitutional moves.

                Now, could they energize Democrats? Possibly.