• Cowbee [he/they]
    link
    fedilink
    292 years ago

    4k is the reasonable limit, combined with 120 FPS or so. Beyond that, the returns are extremely diminished and aren’t worth truly considering.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      480 720 1080 1440 4k is as much as anyone’s gonna need, the next highest thing doesn’t look that much better

      • Cowbee [he/they]
        link
        fedilink
        42 years ago

        There are legitimately diminishing returns, realistically I would say 1080p would be fine to keep at max, but 4k really is the sweet spot. Eventually, there is a physical limit.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          42 years ago

          I fully agree, but I also try to keep aware of when I’m repeating patterns. I thought the same thing about 1080p that I do about 4k, and I want to be aware that I could be wrong again

          • Cowbee [he/they]
            link
            fedilink
            32 years ago

            Yep, I’m aware of it too, the biggest thing for me is that we know we are much closer to physical limitations now than we ever were before. I believe efficiency is going to be the focus, and perhaps energy consumption will be focused on more than raw performance gains outside of sound computing practices.

            Once we hit that theoretical ceiling on the hardware level, performance will likely be gained at the software level, with more efficient and clean code.

    • N-E-N
      link
      fedilink
      02 years ago

      4K id agree with, but going from 120 to 240fps is notable