@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agoIt just gives you extra shame.lemm.eeimagemessage-square17arrow-up1645arrow-down18
arrow-up1637arrow-down1imageIt just gives you extra shame.lemm.ee@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square17
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink7•1 year agoThe concept of servings should just be removed, and be replaced with a standard Nutrients per 100g (or whatever you Americans feel is equivalent. Three ounces or something, I don’t know). We do nutrients per 100g in Sweden, and it’s far better.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•1 year agoI like serving sizes when they’re actually accurate, but too often companies screw the numbers to make their products seem better in some way
The concept of servings should just be removed, and be replaced with a standard Nutrients per 100g (or whatever you Americans feel is equivalent. Three ounces or something, I don’t know). We do nutrients per 100g in Sweden, and it’s far better.
I like serving sizes when they’re actually accurate, but too often companies screw the numbers to make their products seem better in some way