• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -1310 months ago

    For zero delegates…

    Unless the DNC is going to retroactively change their mind and not strip NH of their delegates now that Biden won.

    Which would be really shitty considering lots of people didn’t vote because without delegates it was literally pointless.

    Just because Republicans went full on fascist doesn’t mean Dems need to start pulling this stupid shit.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -28
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        The party could ultimately decide to seat New Hampshire’s delegates at the convention this summer, but as of now, none will be awarded in Tuesday’s Democratic primary.

        https://www.cbsnews.com/news/how-many-delegates-new-hampshire-primary-2024/

        Welp, looks like you’re wrong…

        Edit:

        I’ll add the full context even

        Last year, the Democratic Party moved to shake up its primary calendar and allow South Carolina to hold the first primary. New Hampshire Democrats said moving the date of their primary would require a new state law and couldn’t be done in time.

        The Democratic National Committee said the state violated the party’s rules by holding its contest earlier than allowed, and thus none of the state’s delegates would be up for grabs in the election. Mr. Biden also protested the primary date and withheld his name from the ballot, so anyone who wants to vote for the commander in chief will have to do so with a write-in vote.

        Democratic candidates like Rep. Dean Phillips and self-help author Marianne Williamson will be on the ballot Tuesday, but Mr. Biden is still expected to win. The party could ultimately decide to seat New Hampshire’s delegates at the convention this summer, but as of now, none will be awarded in Tuesday’s Democratic primary.

        In 2020, New Hampshire Democrats allotted 24 pledged delegates.

        24 delegates, thrown out because the state party (who is in charge of primaries) didn’t do what the national party asked, because that would require changing state law and there just wasn’t time for that.

        So the DNC and Biden threw a tantrum and tossed democracy out the window.

        • donuts
          link
          fedilink
          16
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Are you aware that New Hampshire decided to unilaterally put themselves first in the primary schedule based on some nonsense in their state constitution?

          “The presidential primary election shall be held on the second Tuesday in March or on a date selected by the secretary of state which is 7 days or more immediately preceding the date on which any other state shall hold a similar election, whichever is earlier, of each year when a president of the United States is to be elected or the year previous,” the law says.

          But last year, the Democratic Party, supported by President Biden, announced it would be changing its primary calendar to prioritize South Carolina and move up battleground states such as Michigan and Georgia. New Hampshire’s state government, controlled by Republicans, refused to comply with the DNC’s new rules and scheduled the primary for Jan. 23, leaving it first.

          As a result, Mr. Biden is not appearing on the ballot, although his campaign has launched an aggressive write-in campaign. Democratic candidates participating in the unofficial primary on Tuesday will not win any delegates, so any victory will be symbolic.

          https://www.cbsnews.com/news/why-new-hampshire-primary-first-in-the-nation/

          As I’m somewhat a fan of democracy, I think that South Carolina is a much better first primary state than New Hampshire for the simple reason that it better represents the demographic and ideological makeup of that party.

          I agree with the commenter above, you’ve inventing shit to be mad at.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -1710 months ago

            They stripped the state of their primary delegates…

            Because the state party wouldn’t violate state law…

            I get why you added the “somewhat” to that end but tho.

            And I don’t think any exchange with somone so anti-demacratic will ever be productive in a political sub.

            • donuts
              link
              fedilink
              8
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Yep, ya got me bro. Nothing says “i love democracy”, or as you call it “demacracy”, like advocating for a small state which is not at all representative of the broader voting base to unilaterally put itself first in line to the nomination process. 😂

              With people like you around it’s no wonder Socrates was put to death by popular vote. They also loved making shit up to get mad at back then.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -5
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                Yeah, if it was a single person, I’d agree with you…

                But your “party member” is the state party leaders who have no control over state law…

                And the NH state government, their House is Republican, their state Senate is Republican, and their Governor is Republican…

                So what the fuck was the state Democratic party going to do about NH State law in less than a year?

                And why does them failing to do that mean no NH Dem gets a say in who their candidate is?

                Seriously.

                How does this work out that you think the state party had any say?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          The party could ultimately decide to seat New Hampshire’s delegates at the convention this summer, but as of now, none will be awarded in Tuesday’s Democratic primary.

          Yeah, sounds like you’re getting mad at hypotheticals. Maybe hold off on the pitchforks.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -3
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            The pulled the delegates…

            Biden won…

            If they reinstate the delegates, that’s not better, that’s worse. Because the last two primaries the party favorite comes in last and the most progressive has won NH… Canceling it to only put it back in when the moderate party favorite wins is fucked

            Which I didn’t think needed explained, but this thread has shown me my expectations were a lot higher than they should be

    • Hello_there
      link
      fedilink
      1310 months ago

      Because NH got their panties in a twist and decided that their miniscule state needs to be first? They can go fuck off.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -18
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Nope.

        Because there wasn’t enough time for NH to change their state law…

        DNC and Biden got so mad a state wouldn’t violate state law to help him in an election, they stripped the state of their say in who the candidate was. And it’s a total coincidence he got his ass kicked there last primary…

        But it’s cool, because he legitimately is still better than trump, and even though that difference keeps shrinking, no one is allowed to complain about Biden because trump exists…

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1210 months ago

          Because there wasn’t enough time for NH to change their state law

          They had a year’s notice. The rulemaking process began last winter.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -710 months ago

            Do you think the leaders of the state democratic party are in complete control of the laws in NH?

            I’d think of all people, Biden wouldnt expect politicians to rush into anything…

            Or anyone to ever change a politicians mind on how to vote.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              1010 months ago

              They had adequate notice. The state cannot cling to an imagined relevancy and hold a party hostage. The legislature chose not to act and therefore their constituents don’t get to participate in the Democratic Primary.

              Seems pretty straightforward to me.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -810 months ago

                Seems pretty straightforward to me

                Republicans say that about all kinds of crazy rationalizations

                Most people who are against democracy feel like democracy isn’t very important as long as their team wins in fact.

                But I’ve found engaging with that type of people is rarely productive, regardless of what they consider their team.

        • 𝔇𝔦𝔬
          link
          fedilink
          -2310 months ago

          You’re shouting in to a screeching void, haha. These degenerate buffoons don’t care, or want, the truth and figure the down vote arrow is a sword and that it actually deters you.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -1610 months ago

            It turns out 30 years of dragging the Democratic party to the left lost us as many voters as we gained, and now a bunch of “Democrats” act a lot like Republicans and share the same morals…

            What’s crazy is if they had stayed active in the Republican party, they could have actually kept the Republicans somewhat moderate.

            Instead them leaving just concentrated the crazy, and turned 1/3 of the country away from voting.

            The only ones that won from Dems courting Republican voters was conservative extremists. Everyone else lost.