• @djsoren19
    link
    fedilink
    3110 months ago

    It’s pretty sad that I can’t tell if this list was made yesterday or four years ago. If people are able to have fun despite a stagnant industry, all power to them, but I haven’t seen a good game out of AAA in a long while.

    I really hope one day business schools will start teaching people that trying to blindly follow trends in art has literally never worked. Hasn’t worked for all the film studios trying to make their own cinematic universes, hasn’t worked for game studios trying to chase the new live service dragon, but still we get braindead suits getting senior level positions approving derivative drivel.

    • MudMan
      link
      fedilink
      2310 months ago

      Alright, new theory:

      You guys don’t play too many games, right?

      For the record, the best selling games of this year had fewer live service games than last year and the year before. The top of the charts was consistently single player games without microtransactions and this is one of the main GOTY candidates of 2023 following trends from “business schools” straight into… eh… a climactic absurdist musical number.

      I’d tag that as spoilers if I could because, as I said, it’s increasingly clear you guys haven’t been playing this stuff.

      • @JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        610 months ago

        Baldur’s gate 3 wasn’t the top earning video game this year, just the top selling one. The business school cronies only care about the profit, not the quality.

        Lots of money

        • MudMan
          link
          fedilink
          210 months ago

          Different metrics, though.

          I do have to disagree that this chart proves what you say it proves, though. Arguing that Rockstar in particular does not care about quality is… a sizzling hot take.

          Look, there are plenty of grifters in gaming, particularly those coming from the tech side of things (not “business school” so much, honestly). And yeah, there’s a lot of money to be made and the majors are going to want a piece of that pie. Which is fine, because I want them to have money to also go after the big flashy triple-A single player stuff.

          But it’s obviously not true that all you get from the games industry is cookie cutter GaaS stuff. It’s less true by the minute. Which is not to say I want online games to go away, either. I will actively play some of the games on that list. On purpose. I don’t want them to be the only thing there is to play… but fortunately they’re not, so… cool?

      • @djsoren19
        link
        fedilink
        6
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        You’re right, the best selling games have been single-player focused. So why has Ubisoft, EA, Square Enix, ActivisionBlizzard, Warner Bros, and Sony Interactive been pushing to jump on the recent extraction shooter trend? Hell, find me a triple A publisher that does not have a live-service game being maintained, I’ll wait.

        If you’re argument is that AAA is not wasting millions of dollars on chasing trends, you’ll have to find more evidence than all their projects being failures.

        • MudMan
          link
          fedilink
          510 months ago

          Because they’re not all failures, they’re also making single player games and you’re assuming that the one example of publishers wanting to tick a box in their lineup is somehow all they (let alone the entire industry) are producing.

          The fact that people are making extraction shooters doesn’t mean they’re not making anything else. Warner’s biggest game this year is a narrative RPG. EA’s biggest game is (as always) a sports game, and their highest reviewed games are a Star Wars single player action game and a single player horror game. Sony’s biggest game is an open world superhero action game. I don’t know about Ubi’s sales off the top of my head, but what they’ve shipped recently is a 2D metroidvania and a throwback to classic Assassin’s Creed.

          I don’t understand why you want publishers to be judged by what they don’t make, as opposed to what they make. Major publishers are billion dollar companies that put out many games. I have zero problems with EA running Apex Legends if I get to play Dead Space. I have zero problems with Sony trying to get a live service game going if they keep making insanely refined narrative action games. I don’t enjoy every game people make, but I don’t hate that people make games that are not for me if there are also games for me happening at the same time.

              • @TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                110 months ago

                It’s AAA in a sense, but it isn’t bullshit. In fact, indie games can be bullshit in the form of asset flips, knock offs, and uninspired crap. Budget doesn’t directly determine bullshit, it’s just that AAA bullshit is a more noticeable issue.

                Regardless, great media makes money alongside trash media. That’s how it’s always been, we just don’t remember the trash as much.

    • 1ostA5tro6yneOP
      link
      fedilink
      410 months ago

      I just had someone telling me if I can’t tell the new street fighter installment from the old one then i must not have eyes. It looks practically identical to the previous three installments. I think I’m done trying to interact with gamers for literally anything.

      • @JillyB@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        710 months ago

        You have to take a very cursory glance to not find differences between Street Fighter 5 and 6. The gameplay systems are very different, 6 has an actually good single player mode, the net code is vastly improved. If you’re just looking at the graphics, you’re doing the same thing this post is criticizing but for the opposite goal. Street Fighter 6 is one of the AAA home runs, especially when you consider the disasterous launch of SF5.

        • 1ostA5tro6yneOP
          link
          fedilink
          110 months ago

          it’s a niche game that i know little about, have no interest in, and definitely am not going to shell out money for; he’s bitter that I don’t care and I’m not impressed that a franchise older than I am shat out another entry.

          • @JillyB@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            510 months ago

            Do you even like video games? Judging by your comments in this thread, they make you angry and bitter, so I don’t know why you bother to post about them.

            • 1ostA5tro6yneOP
              link
              fedilink
              110 months ago

              I don’t play a niche game franchise enough to see the difference between last year’s iteration and this one, therefore I must not like games at all. It’s FIFA with anime characters to me, doesn’t mean I don’t like other things.

              • @skulblaka@startrek.website
                link
                fedilink
                310 months ago

                “A niche game franchise” lmao Street Fighter is one of the most popular and well known game series in the world. I won’t say it’s the best fighting game franchise, but it is very much a household name just as much as Mario or Pokémon are.

              • @JillyB@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                110 months ago

                Street Fighter 1 was from 1987. Street Fighter 5 is from 2016. This is hardly a yearly franchise. Each release is a cornerstone of the fighting game genre. If you don’t like them or are uninterested, that’s obviously fine. But you’re using your ignorance to justify hating Street Fighter. That just doesn’t make sense and makes you come across as bitter. I would urge you to play the games you like, and ignore the games you don’t like. You’ll be generally happier.

                • 1ostA5tro6yneOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  110 months ago

                  of course it isn’t annual, who said that? I never said I hated it either, I’m just not interested. it’s like nobody in here understands things like hyperbole, or figures of speech, or not caring about a niche genre. weirdos