• ZephrC
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    56 months ago

    I guess, it just seems odd to me to correct a meme for using a term in way that’s absolutely vital for both the rhyme and the pun to actually happen and not even really wrong, just weird if you over-analyze it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -16 months ago

      It’s not even over-analyzing. A revolver does not take shells; they use cartridges, which are not shells. That’s just a simple fact.

      • ZephrC
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        06 months ago

        Uh, no. No it’s not. You can have a cartridge that fires a shell instead of a bullet. That is totally a thing.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          0
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          One that is designed for revolvers, not shotguns? (And yes, I know about revolver shotguns, but those are mainly just a gimmick and not really ever used in most contexts. I’m talking about handgun revolvers.)

          • ZephrC
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            16 months ago

            Okay. I see the problem here. Shell doesn’t mean shotgun round. Bullet and shell are technical terms for the bit of a round that comes out of the business end of a weapon at high velocity. A bullet is a single, simple solid mass that follows a ballistic trajectory and just imparts kinetic force into whatever it hits. A shell is anything more complicated than that. Shotguns are just the small arms weapons that are most likely to use shells, but anything can, and it doesn’t have to be buckshot to be a shell. Even something as simple as a tracer round is technically a shell.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              25 months ago

              …You know, thinking about it, I think you’re right. After all, artillery uses shells, and they’re not exactly buckshot, those things. Lol.