I’m a filthy 5e casual, what sort of madness should I expect?

(I’ve played a couple of PF1e one-shots and built a few characters so I know the surface-level differences, but what sort of 5e thinking do I need to un-learn?)

  • @Eagle0600
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    at level 1 I get two spells to last a whole day

    This is going to get better at higher levels, but will never not be an issue. Full-casters need to be able to make the most of their higher-level spell slots and still be able to function with their lower-level spell slots. Mid-casters like yourself need to be able to function without spells, and make sure the spells they do cast count.

    I’ve already re-adjusted my character to care less about casting spells because it seems I’ll hardly get the chance to do it!

    All the more reason to make sure your spells have an impact when you do cast them. That’s not to say it should never be cast just to deal more damage, but it does mean you should be asking yourself what spell would have the most impact and also when to cast it to have the most impact.

    Also I don’t seem to have any damaging touch-range cantrips, is that a deliberate decision because they’d be too good for spell combat + spellstrike?

    I’m not sure about that. The basic arcane cantrip list predates the Magus (by a lot, considering it was based mostly on the 3.5e DnD cantrips), so spellstrike and spell combat were certainly not considerations when putting that list together. Considering those cantrips were designed for use by low-level sorcerers and wizards, I believe the designers probably just thought no-one would ever use a touch-range cantrip to deal a bit of damage.

    Where it comes to the magus, a damage-dealing cantrip would only be a little bit of extra damage for you. Nice, but the main benefit comes from having a touch-ranged cantrip at all, no matter what its effect. Arcane mark fits the bill, allowing you to make that extra attack without expending a spell slot.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      Coming from 5e land where spellcasters would probably never touch a physical weapon and have higher damage from cantrips it seems odd not to have a touch-range cantrip that a squishy wizard can use if someone gets in their face. I guess in PF you don’t generally want to be casting touch-range spells due to the AoE provocation, you’d generally just 5-foot step back and use your ranged spell, right?

      I’ve seen arcane mark mentioned as the “default” spellstrike spell, I guess it makes sense to get the free attack, just seems like a waste to be casting a spell that does nothing when I could be doing more!