Yesterday penguinz0 made a video about the current state of modern blockbusters and its something I think would be interesting to discuss here. In my opinion it would be for the best if the MCU was put out to pasture and the Disney monopoly was broken up.

It seems like more and more blockbusters have the sane tone, the same style and the same direction. Its like they are written and directed by the same handful of people. The Flash, Indiana Jones 5, and Ant Man 5 all felt like they had the same writers and directors. I place a lot of the blame for this on Disney. Ever since Disney Plus launched everything marvel put out has been so paint by numbers.

What do you all think. Would love to hear your thoughts on this.

  • @mymanchris@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    31 year ago

    This is demonstrably untrue, and contradicted by your own statement. Guardians 3, Spider-Man Across the Spiderverse both did very well in theaters despite being big franchise movies. Audiences aren’t tired of the theater, they are tired of spending big dollars for badly written movies at the theater.

    Disney and Marvel have been cranking out a massive flood of titles over the past 5 years, and that has diluted the talent pool and shortened the development pipeline forcing way more cookie cutter scripts going through far less review with much worse CGI hitting the big screen. It isn’t cinema people that is keeping people away, it is bland, uncreative cinema with bad writing.

    • DreamerOfImprobableDreams
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I think you missed OP’s point that studios care about minimizing risk as much as they care about maximizing profit. Sure, if you take risks maybe you’ll come out with a smash hit that makes you billions-- but you could just as easily come out with a bomb that costs you hundreds of millions of dollars.

      Let’s say your studio has a budget of $500 million for this year. You’ve decided to produce 10 movies, each costing an average of $50 million to make. You could take risks, leading to two gems that each pull in $500 million, and eight stinkers that “only” pull in $5 million. (Remember, they cost $50 million to make each, so you’re losing $45 million per flop here.) You end the year with $680 million, for a profit of $180 million. Not bad, all things considered, but not spectacular margins.

      Alternatively, you could play it safely by numbers, and make $100 million per movie. Now you’re making a profit of $5 billion.

      If you’re a corporate exect who doesn’t give a damn about art and only cares about the numbers, it’s tragically a no-brainer.