@[email protected]M to [email protected] • 9 months agoA Demographic Time Bomb Is About to Hit the Beef Industrywww.wired.comexternal-linkmessage-square73arrow-up1160arrow-down16cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1154arrow-down1external-linkA Demographic Time Bomb Is About to Hit the Beef Industrywww.wired.com@[email protected]M to [email protected] • 9 months agomessage-square73cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•9 months ago all sentient beings are morally relevant under what ethical system?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•9 months agohttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sentiocentrism https://sentientism.info/
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•9 months agothat’s not my ethical system. most people don’t subscribe to it.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•9 months agoRight, most people subscribe to their holy book(s) of choice
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•9 months agoeven among professional philosophers the prevailing ethical system is deontology
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-1•9 months agoaccording to some, but kant never went in for it. the strongest attempt to marry them seems to be from korsgaard, but howe treated her argument pretty roughly in “why kant animals have rights” (2019)
under what ethical system?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sentiocentrism
https://sentientism.info/
that’s not my ethical system. most people don’t subscribe to it.
Right, most people subscribe to their holy book(s) of choice
even among professional philosophers the prevailing ethical system is deontology
sentientism is compatible with deontology
according to some, but kant never went in for it. the strongest attempt to marry them seems to be from korsgaard, but howe treated her argument pretty roughly in “why kant animals have rights” (2019)