• 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    good luck doing that if you’re having network issues.

    One of the reasons why I would like IR Blasters to become common in most phones again. In a smartphone, those would be way more useful than the regular-ass cell phones I remember having them in all the time.

    • TurtlePower
      link
      fedilink
      29 months ago

      I had a phone that had an IR Blaster. It was a Samsung Galaxy but I forget what model. (It was around after Iron Man 2 came out.) Man was that an awesome feature! Put away all my remotes because I could control my TV and home theater system with just my phone (and not having to pay for an expensive-ass Harmony remote).

      • wjrii
        link
        fedilink
        19 months ago

        Nothing worse for me than a complicated remote that’s touchscreen only. It’s just as annoying as car infotainment touchscreens, though tbf, also like a million times safer, LOL. I’m trying to find something to watch, so I don’t want to have to look at the remote or make sure my thumb hasn’t slipped a few millimeters. I prefer a well programmed Harmony or URC (once you wade through the gatekeeping and find some software) or just committing to a simpler setup with one or two remotes.

        • TurtlePower
          link
          fedilink
          09 months ago

          Well, it’s been a long time so I have no idea if they still do, but Harmony made a phone app, you just had to buy their expensive-ass IR blaster kit that had a couple or so IR blasters that you stuck near your devices’ IR receivers. I’d rather have the Blaster in the phone and just download an app. And the app I had was just as programmable as the Harmony stuff.

          • yukichigai
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            That sounds like it’d suffer from the same problem a TV App would: if your network is having problems you suddenly can’t control your devices. The less intermediary connections between the controls and the device you’re controlling, the better.

            I mean that’s still kinda cool though, it just doesn’t sound like it’d solve this specific problem.

          • wjrii
            link
            fedilink
            19 months ago

            The main thing for me is no-look tactility. I have a Roku remote app as a backup, and it’s annoying even with many fewer controls than the dedicated remote apps I’ve seen. I should be able to feel when my thumb has slipped over from the nav cross to the volume buttons. Different functional clusters should start in a sensible place and feel physically distinct from the other buttons, due to some combination of shape and placement.

      • yukichigai
        link
        fedilink
        19 months ago

        I know the Galaxy S4 had it, as did the Galaxy S4 Active. Also the Active had physical buttons. I know because I rocked that thing for far longer than its intended lifetime. Still have it somewhere, actually.

        …hell, maybe I should get IR software up and running on that thing.