• StametsOP
      link
      fedilink
      5611 months ago

      Nah, what’s weird is for you to openly lie and make shit up for no reason.

      He made $320,000 over a 7 year period.

      Source.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -4911 months ago

        The group made far more than that, and of course he would downplay the amount himself to make his portion look less.

        They sold millions of copies of a hardware for over $50. The group made mint and there was 3 of them.

        • StametsOP
          link
          fedilink
          4311 months ago

          So you have no sources other than what you think?

          Yeah I’m going to stick with the documents that were shown in legal proceedings, thanks.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -42
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            It’s how court cases shake down, especially with plea deals. And what court documents for one thing? Nothing in your links show court documents, just a blurp that also agrees with what I stated.

            If you think he made that little with the hack, I don’t know what to say. You also seem to think they can garnish disability benefits, you’re mad over nothing and the wrong things.

            But of course you’ll be upvoted since yay piracy! Nothing to do with the actual issue.

            • StametsOP
              link
              fedilink
              33
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              So… again… you have no sources other than what you think? Either offer sources that back up your claims or stop making comments that are immediately proven false.

              I also did believe that they could because I misread something. That’s on me and has been edited. Next time I would also recommend trying to correct someone by acting like an adult instead of whatever this behavior is. Sorry about the mistake but you really could have addressed that with a very different attitude.

              Lastly, the actual issue is a misrepresentation on how much lost revenue Nintendo gained from this man. Piracy is a factor. It is not the driving force.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                -28
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                They profited heavily from and endorsed not just protective piracy, they aren’t innocent, far from it. What they did was actively harmful to the community as a whole as well.

                Don’t make a career out of a hobby, that’s why they got burned so hard.

                • lad
                  link
                  fedilink
                  311 months ago

                  Could you elaborate on “harmful to the community” part? It was mentioned in another thread that they could brick the device, but I couldn’t find any details, for now at least

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2111 months ago

      Why is it weird to be mad at a multibillion dollar corporation for garnishing the wages of a disabled person’s disability benefits, simply because he was providing the means to do what you want with your device? I don’t care what the courts say. It should not be illegal to sell something that allows you to do what you want with your device. Even if that device facilitates piracy. IP isn’t real and shouldn’t exist in the first place.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          611 months ago

          I actually didn’t know they were directly selling pirated software, I thought it was only about the modding device. However, I’m glad you recognize the extremely excessive nature of the ruling. Do you happen to know why they went after a single individual instead of the whole group?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -13
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            It shows people are getting mad just because someone endorsing piracy got their comeuppance instead of what actually matters.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              1011 months ago

              Just to be clear, you’re ok with saddling a disabled person with $14m dollar fine to a multibillion dollar corporation, for the crime of making $300k on a device that allows you to do what you want with your device? It wasn’t specifically meant for piracy, there are several good and legitimate reasons to have full control of your device.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  5
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  Because he lives in the US Canada, where it’s expensive as fuck to just exist as a disabled person.

                  • StametsOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    5
                    edit-2
                    11 months ago

                    He actually lives in Canada. Your comment still applies overall as it is not feasible to live adequately on disability here but he’s not in the US.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -6
                    edit-2
                    11 months ago

                    Person is in Canada and has disability insurance as well as government benefits. Unless the articles are wrong in saying disability insurance.

                    Still don’t see how it’s relevant to the story about being fined. Would be the same story for anyone disability or not.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        211 months ago

        disability benefits can’t be garnished. i think it’s ok to be mad at people for spreading misinformation even if they themselves are fighting a just cause. lies like this help nobody.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        IP isn’t real and shouldn’t exist in the first place.

        This. They’ve made up a dubious analogy between owning physical items and knowledge, and make the “burn the witch” act when you point out that it’s unsatisfactory to make laws, and there are plenty of people running around who haven’t ever made anything in their lives which would be impeded by IP, so they just support it.

        I know a few people who’ve made IP-worthy things, sometimes published (small-issue), the pattern is that they are against IP (while for them I’d understand having emotional reasons to support it).