The part in which you derailed the civil conversation I was trying to have with you on the core ideology of communism (transphobia) which you turned into a weird semantics mud fight, even though the fact that communism is inherently transphobic was already established.
Typical fascism, trying to dodge responsibility and avoiding saying the quiet parts out loud. Glad I read you hateful fucks like a book.
It was more of a rhetorical question as you tried to shift your own thoughts to show up as a quote from someone else. And with that rhetorical method I demonstrated that it in fact wasn’t about me.
Uh-huh. And we’ve demonstrated that what you’re describing is happening in your imagination as I have no comments which would indicate anything like that as my ideology.
‘Literally quoting’ would mean that the quoted words are something I’d had written somewhere which isn’t true.
And again you’re attacking an antifascist which is a problematic position for you to take.
Should we assume that your non-truths are deliberate lies and thus the phobic remarks are actually projection?
I do appreciate it if one would like to admit and fix their mistake.
what you’re describing is happening in your imagination
Just to be clear, I am the only one in this thread trying to keep the discussion anchored in reality instead of semantics.
Literally quoting’ would mean that the quoted words are something I’d had written somewhere which isn’t true.
This is like the fifth time fascists have demonstrated this on this comment chain alone. I only implied being a transphobe but in fact I never actually wrote it down :)
Should we assume that your non-truths are deliberate lies and thus the phobic remarks are actually projection?
Again, I am the only one here even showing sympathy towards the victims of communism.
I take that as an admission of fascism.
And I’ll insult fascists when I see them.
Can you please show ‘wanting civil discussion’ as part of anyone’s definition of fascism?
I can show transphobia as a part of it
Please quote me being transphobic. I would be interested in seeing what I sad that was transphobic. Unless that was a lie, of course. Was it a lie?
The part in which you derailed the civil conversation I was trying to have with you on the core ideology of communism (transphobia) which you turned into a weird semantics mud fight, even though the fact that communism is inherently transphobic was already established.
Typical fascism, trying to dodge responsibility and avoiding saying the quiet parts out loud. Glad I read you hateful fucks like a book.
Ah, now it is a core ideology.
If it is a core ideology, please show where it is in Das Kapital, which lays out the core ideologies of communism.
Again with this lmao, you really can’t commit to a civil discussion about reality can you? I’ll show you a list where communists gathered their transgendered people.
Please quote my incivility. Please quote a single uncivil thing I said.
Please stay within the topic. Explain how communism isn’t intrinsically fascist even though all communist regimes have been fascist.
By the way, you insulted me after my first response to you, so I’m not sure when you were trying to have a civil conversation with me.
Umm I’m an antifascist and you’re insulting that other commenter and me. That (and apparent capitalism apologia) kinda makes you align with fascists
Again, go fuck yourself
Are you quoting yourself?
No, just you
That’s how quotes are used, otherwise it’s just a comment you know
It was more of a rhetorical question as you tried to shift your own thoughts to show up as a quote from someone else. And with that rhetorical method I demonstrated that it in fact wasn’t about me.
I was literally quoting you. You support transphobic ideologies, you are a transphobe. Simple as.
Very common for fascists to dodge responsibility for their comments though.
Uh-huh. And we’ve demonstrated that what you’re describing is happening in your imagination as I have no comments which would indicate anything like that as my ideology.
‘Literally quoting’ would mean that the quoted words are something I’d had written somewhere which isn’t true.
And again you’re attacking an antifascist which is a problematic position for you to take.
Should we assume that your non-truths are deliberate lies and thus the phobic remarks are actually projection?
I do appreciate it if one would like to admit and fix their mistake.
Just to be clear, I am the only one in this thread trying to keep the discussion anchored in reality instead of semantics.
This is like the fifth time fascists have demonstrated this on this comment chain alone. I only implied being a transphobe but in fact I never actually wrote it down :)
Again, I am the only one here even showing sympathy towards the victims of communism.