like i’m watching blue planet and i’m yelling at the tv!

there’s all these yimmer yammer hand-wavey scientific rigor lines where it’s like ‘we may believe that these animals do on occasion have a base brain-related impulse that allows them to experience feelings somewhat like to those of friendship’ or whatever in the script on top of footage that they then describe as ‘it seems as though these two groups [of fish, different species] are old friends…’ in an almost whimsical manner.

can’t they give them some credit! they have eyes and a face, why is it so insane to think they can’t experience friendship or love or joy just like us? ‘buhhu uhhh its only accurate science if we only observe observable behavior’ why?? you’re neglecting a whole part of any living thing’s experience! inner life can’t be hand waved away! even for a mollusk!

and people loved doing this on reddit as well – oh actually your cat doesn’t understand love or joy or humor, it is simply reacting to the physical warmth of your lap, they don’t actually care for you. don’t worry, depth and emotion does not exist!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    37 months ago

    Feelings in the sense of “they feel things through a sensory organ and react to that”, same as sight, hearing, touch? Sure!

    Feelings like fear? No.

    Aversion from pain is not the same as fear, fear is aversion from pain that hasn’t happened yet, it requires the ability to abstract the concept of negative outcomes and expand the aversion from discomfort to possible discomfort.

    No plant has been observed reacting to something that it hasn’t experienced at least once before.

    • Decoy321
      link
      fedilink
      17 months ago

      Your bias is showing. The fact that we have not observed something is not evidence that it doesn’t exist.

        • Decoy321
          link
          fedilink
          07 months ago

          I give him the same level of acceptance as Allah, Vishnu, Odin, and the Flying Spaghetti Monster. There’s a nonzero possibility that they’re real, after all. I try to keep an open mind.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            17 months ago

            Sure, I give a sentient mollusk the same credence, i.e. a token amount that does not change my behaviour at all.

            • Decoy321
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Right, because that token credence is completely in line with your previous assertive dismissal of your earlier comments. How very open minded.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                -17 months ago

                Yeah, it is in line.

                Are you not sinning for fear of retribution? Would you give pause to your actions only cause I called them sinful, or would you dismiss my accusations and go on with your day?

                I’m dismissive because that’s what “token” credence gets you. Yeah, it may be possible, but we all know it’s about as likely as the sky falling tomorrow, so I’m not about to waste my time entertaining the possibility.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            17 months ago

            Theoretical is not the same as “made the fuck up”

            Something being theoretical is as good as it gets short of being observed in science, it means the most evidence points to it being real which is why we spent insane amounts of money to find evidence of it.

            If you were to postulate black holes without evidence they would exist but they would still made the fuck up until proven otherwise, not “theoretical”.

            Again, have you accepted the lord Jesus Christ?