A mother and her 14-year-old daughter are advocating for better protections for victims after AI-generated nude images of the teen and other female classmates were circulated at a high school in New Jersey.

Meanwhile, on the other side of the country, officials are investigating an incident involving a teenage boy who allegedly used artificial intelligence to create and distribute similar images of other students – also teen girls - that attend a high school in suburban Seattle, Washington.

The disturbing cases have put a spotlight yet again on explicit AI-generated material that overwhelmingly harms women and children and is booming online at an unprecedented rate. According to an analysis by independent researcher Genevieve Oh that was shared with The Associated Press, more than 143,000 new deepfake videos were posted online this year, which surpasses every other year combined.

  • @Fal
    link
    fedilink
    English
    27 months ago

    Well that’s just absurd and you should rethink your position using logic rather than emotion.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      “that’s just absurd”

      Well that’s an emotional response that includes no specifics or appeals to logic.

      “rethink your position using logic rather than emotion”

      Lol.

      • @Fal
        link
        fedilink
        English
        17 months ago

        Well that’s an emotional response that includes no specifics or appeals to logic.

        You clearly have no logic so I’m not going to appeal to it. Just a general comment.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          17 months ago

          I am shocked to my core that you would write off an observation as having no logic. Shocked I tell you!

          • @Fal
            link
            fedilink
            English
            27 months ago

            I am perfectly cool with animated depictions of child sexual exploitation being in the same category as regualr child exploitation regardless

            Not an observation. You’re saying you don’t care about actual victims, children actually being abused. Real, live victims. That’s not worse than someone drawing some pictures you don’t like?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              07 months ago

              First of all I didn’t say any of things you’re inferring from the quote you posted.

              But yes, I think sexually exploitative imagery of children is just as vile and disgusting as behavior that directly harms children and very indicative of someone who may attempt to harm a child in the future.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              07 months ago

              Wow, you got me. That’s totally what I am saying that you had to fabricate a quote that represents the argument you want to have.

              • @Fal
                link
                fedilink
                English
                27 months ago

                Fabricate a quote? I literally quoted the start of the thread.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  1
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  Misattribute then? My only position was that your rebuttal was not logical while asking for logic, which I thought was funny and “absurd” as you put it.