• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    17 months ago

    just that what we call mainstream is the representation of objective beauty

    Beauty can be only subjective by definition.

    • Blue
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Nope, facial and body symmetry can determine if someone is considered universally beautiful.

      And it’s not limited to humans, animals and plants can be considered universally beautiful.

      The sea and the starry sky, a sunset, the moon etc, if it moves emotion within you then it’s beautiful, and there are things that move the world entirely.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        27 months ago

        Nope, facial and body symmetry can determine if someone is considered universally beautiful.

        Facial and body symmetry is ugly or at least scary. You’ve just never seen people with that.

        Other than that - beauty is by definition your own opinion on whether something looks good or bad. If there’s a single person in the world who disagrees - then it’s not universal. If there is none, but there may be the next moment - then it’s not universal.

        and there are things that move the world entirely

        Nothing moves the world entirely. Majority vote doesn’t apply here and even the 3 (or up to 7, whatever) sigma rule doesn’t.

        • Blue
          link
          fedilink
          English
          07 months ago

          I respect your wrong opinion, have a nice day.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            37 months ago

            Take a sufficiently well-centered photo, leave only the left or the right half, and replace the other one with its mirrored version. Then honestly say whether what you see is beautiful or ugly.

            If you know that, just walk around here trolling, then bon appetit and ignore my advice.