• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    07 months ago

    Are you saying everything we can talk about is arbitrary because everything we can talk about is with words and concepts?

    Are you talking about meriological nihilism? (thanks alex oconnor for teaching me that term lol)

    I know sentience is real based on the fact that I’m experiencing things right this moment. Based on my understanding of the brain and nervous system, and the strong evidence that those things give rise to my sentience, I think that it’s reasonable to extrapolate that other, similar nervous systems/brains are also sentient and their experience is worth consideration in a similar way to how I consider my own experience (among the many other reasons to have a basic level of empathy)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17 months ago

      why sentience and not DNA? or literally any other characteristic? your standard is absolutely arbitrary.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        17 months ago

        Based on my understanding of the brain and nervous system, and the strong evidence that those things give rise to my sentience, I think that it’s reasonable to extrapolate that other, similar nervous systems/brains are also sentient and their experience is worth consideration in a similar way to how I consider my own experience (among the many other reasons to have a basic level of empathy)

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          17 months ago

          the same can be said of DNA. this is a completely arbitrary standard, and you would be better served to embrace that than pretending it’s somehow objective.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            I’m not saying it is objective, I’m saying it’s not arbitrary.

            If my dna was isolated in a test tube and it could experience things then I would also care about what it experiences. There isn’t any evidence I’m aware of that that’s the case. Dna is the instructions and tool to build the sentient being, not the sentient being itself. So no, the same couldn’t be said of dna. Extrapolating from how much I care about what I experience, I think it’s reasonable to care about what things that experience things experience

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              17 months ago

              I’m not saying it is objective, I’m saying it’s not arbitrary.

              this can’t be true. it’s self-contradictory.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  17 months ago

                  I mean there is no objective reason to set the standard at sentience any more than any other standard.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    1
                    edit-2
                    7 months ago

                    Then based on the way you are using arbitrary, I see why you think my position is arbitrary. Do you think all positions are arbitrary?