True enough, it’ll definitely be distended and have signs of visible arousal during the moments that someone is having vaginal intercourse. No long-term changes after arousal does down, tho.
Ah yes, obviously this is true. I’ve had to circumcise myself every 7 years as a result. Fortunately foreskins are useful for witchcraft, so it’s kind of like a side hustle.
That’s actually not true, there are quite a lot of cells in our bodies which are never replaced such as the lenses, cones, and rods in our eyes, egg cells, neurons, the hairs that detect sound in our ears, our heart muscles, among many others. The ones that do get replaced vary greatly in how long that takes or how often it happens.
They’re saying during sex which yes there are physical changes to the presentation that occur when aroused. Not this bullshit sandwich effect for sure but still, they’re not wrong it’s just a really weird point.
As far as I know, the way it looks down there is entirely genetic. With the exception of maybe popping out a child and having an episiotomy or some such. Like men with differing penis sizes, not all vaginas are made the same.
My thoughts are- literally no one’s pussy looks like sandwiches with lunch meat in them. They look like a pussy, they grow and change with your body just like every single part of your body. All pussy is beautiful, regardless of what it looks like, so why the absolute fuck are you so concerned with comparing yours to anyone else’s?
Edit: and the fact that apparently you and your partner’s sex life is non-existent except to force new people to exist in this toxic sounding life of yours is really not the flex you think it is…
find it hard to believe that a newborn baby girl could have an overflowing-roast beef-looking vulva like that photo up there on the left.
Yes, newborn babies have not yet gone through puberty, where hormones cause quite a bit of growth and change in our reproductive organs, so you are correct that you should not expect such large labia on a newborn baby.
The size of labia would stay the same, the muscles inside would change but not in regards to number of partners but how much exercise the muscles would get.
The virgin are much less in the risk of pregnancy, which carries the danger of rips and tear in the area at child birth
Just to make it clear, to anyone who may be in doubt… Ussage does not affect the way your “sandwich” looks.
Not true at all. A vagina looks way different when you’re having vaginal sex.
True enough, it’ll definitely be distended and have signs of visible arousal during the moments that someone is having vaginal intercourse. No long-term changes after arousal does down, tho.
What is this mythical post-arousal phase you’re talking about. I’m horny 24/7.
I am too, but we’re talking about vaginas so I didn’t think it was relevant :p
Correct but only during sex. Returns to normal after use. Not like this picture suggest that the more sex you have the more of an outie you get
Not only that, but every 7 year all your cells in your body are replaced.
So if you don’t have sex for 7 years, you are back to being a virgin.
Ah yes, obviously this is true. I’ve had to circumcise myself every 7 years as a result. Fortunately foreskins are useful for witchcraft, so it’s kind of like a side hustle.
Ah yes, the loophole of Theseus.
That’s actually not true, there are quite a lot of cells in our bodies which are never replaced such as the lenses, cones, and rods in our eyes, egg cells, neurons, the hairs that detect sound in our ears, our heart muscles, among many others. The ones that do get replaced vary greatly in how long that takes or how often it happens.
Prove it
They’re saying during sex which yes there are physical changes to the presentation that occur when aroused. Not this bullshit sandwich effect for sure but still, they’re not wrong it’s just a really weird point.
The person you’re replying to is named Send me photos. I think they were just trying to get some noods.
edit: typo
I see that, but I responded because the person above sendmephotos was negative and it kinda bothered me.
deleted by creator
Pretty close, yeah.
Yep!
deleted by creator
Have you ever touched a woman in your life?
deleted by creator
Then you should know your own physiology. Vaginas relax with age, not use.
deleted by creator
Good thing it’s true!
Removed by mod
deleted by creator
You should do your own research before doubting what others tell you to be true. Especially when you are outnumbered
Does your dick get longer every time you fuck?
If it doesn’t how am I supposed to do the fucking?
deleted by creator
Well it does not look like that because you haven’t used it.it could as well have look any other way
deleted by creator
As far as I know, the way it looks down there is entirely genetic. With the exception of maybe popping out a child and having an episiotomy or some such. Like men with differing penis sizes, not all vaginas are made the same.
My thoughts are- literally no one’s pussy looks like sandwiches with lunch meat in them. They look like a pussy, they grow and change with your body just like every single part of your body. All pussy is beautiful, regardless of what it looks like, so why the absolute fuck are you so concerned with comparing yours to anyone else’s?
Edit: and the fact that apparently you and your partner’s sex life is non-existent except to force new people to exist in this toxic sounding life of yours is really not the flex you think it is…
deleted by creator
Yes, newborn babies have not yet gone through puberty, where hormones cause quite a bit of growth and change in our reproductive organs, so you are correct that you should not expect such large labia on a newborn baby.
deleted by creator
I didn’t realize it was a reply to you both times but its a sign that you in fact don’t get it!
Removed by mod
deleted by creator
Removed by mod
The size of labia would stay the same, the muscles inside would change but not in regards to number of partners but how much exercise the muscles would get.
The virgin are much less in the risk of pregnancy, which carries the danger of rips and tear in the area at child birth
deleted by creator