• sebinspace
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -210 months ago

    Think part of it is that Chris Robert’s comes from a time when games couldn’t be patched.

    • SSTF
      link
      fedilink
      English
      710 months ago

      No, there’s really no excusing this game’s development. If anything, Robert’s should have learned from Freelancer to have a tight core product that’s actually shippable.

      At this point Internet nerds are locked into throwing money at Star Citizen’s development, making it the closest thing humanity has achieved to a perpetual motion machine.

        • SSTF
          link
          fedilink
          English
          10
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          I suppose I should have elaborated.

          Chris Roberts begin developing Freelancer with a similar aspiration of total simulation that Star Citizen now promises.

          Freelancer repeatedly overshot development timelines and Roberts was running out of money. He had to go to Microsoft for cash. Microsoft gave money to develop Freelancer in exchange for Roberts being essentially demoted to a consultant, and Microsoft taking charge. Microsoft immediately began cutting features and mechanics to turn Freelancer from an amorphous project into a shippable game.

          If you know that, then seeing Roberts in charge of a new game, with no oversight and essentially infinite development time, the resulting quantum superposition state of Star Citizen’s release should not be surprising.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -110 months ago

            ya, now it’s the people who play the game funding it instead of corporate executives, and honestly I think that’s a good thing, look at Elite Dangerous, No man’s sky (even after the patches) or Starfield, sure they might be “completed games” but can’t hold a candle to SC in it’s pre-alpha in terms of gameplay