E.g. abortion rights, anti-LGBTQ, contempt for atheism, Christian nationalism, etc.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -87 months ago

    Okay, well I don’t care enough about winning arguments on the Internet in order to write a whole research paper right now, so I guess we’ll just have to agree to disagree and call it a draw.

    • Stoneykins [any]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      That is exactly my point. Glad you could see it my way.

      Except for the draw part. This wasn’t a competition, and in the nicest way possible, I’ll just walk away from this thinking you are fully incorrect, and I assume you will do the same about me. “Agree to disagree” is more for people who actually know each other. Bye stranger!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -67 months ago

        Well, a draw means that neither of us is more correct than the other, at least that’s what I’ll take away from this.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          47 months ago

          Stop trying to be a winner on a fucking argument and just look for the facts instead you silly goose.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        07 months ago

        Not as ridiculous as you, who, having made no arguments whatsoever, just comes barging in two days later just to give their opinion on the matter.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          17 months ago

          You sound like a petulant child out of their depth. An intelligent person would have a fairly easy time figuring out where I stand on the topic based on my response.

          Forgive me for not being terminally online and Lemmy showing me older posts.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            07 months ago

            Yeah, I’m afraid that’s just an ad hominem, not an argument.

            And no, I don’t have a problem figuring out where you stand on the issue, but since you apparently can’t even defend your position without resorting to insults, this seems to be a clear case of “you can’t reason anyone out of an opinion which by reason they never acquired”.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              17 months ago

              If you think you have the right to tell a woman what she can and cannot do with her own body then I don’t give a flying fuck about anything you have to say, regardless of how you dress it up.

              Don’t bother responding.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                07 months ago

                Of course I have a right to tell her that, whether or not she actually does it, or whether I have the right to violently enforce my opinion on her is an entirely different matter. But we were just arguing hypotheticals in this thread anyways.

                FWIW I’m not convinced that banning abortion is the solution, but neither that making it easier and safer to access solves any problems, because neither do anything to address the root cause of why women feel like they need to have any abortions at all (excluding those necessary for medical reasons of course).

                But sure, I’m clearly the petulant child here that’s out of my depth, because an intelligent person would have no problem seeing such nuances instead of resorting to politically popular catch phrases.

                And it’s funny, isn’t it, because women tell men all the time what they ought to do with their bodies (go to work, make money, provide for the family, share the housework, don’t drink, don’t do drugs, the list goes on), yet as a man, I’m supposedly not allowed to even have an opinion what what a woman should do with hers? I’m sorry, that just sounds like blatant sexism, but I’m sure that as long as it’s in favor of women, you’re perfectly happy accepting that.