• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1318 months ago

    The whole “purebred” thing always seems weird to me, “purebred” royal families aren’t pretty but full of genetic defects, why should it be an better with cats or dogs.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      598 months ago

      Nearly every cat I ever had was once a stray and I wouldn’t trade that for the world.

        • credit crazy
          link
          fedilink
          158 months ago

          Honestly it’s always something magical when a cat decides ah yes you are my human. It’s like the dark souls version of getting a dog. And thusly cats in a way are the peak of loyalty because no one else can win a cats favor.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          48 months ago

          I was at cat lounge/rescue/adoption place in my area recently (not to adopt, just to pet the cats) and one of the cats, a maybe ~7mo female tabby with a slightly fucked up ear named Maggie, after spending most of the time I was there hiding in a corner, decided she liked me, came up to me, sat down on my lap, and refused to budge. One of the staff members came up to say “hey man you’re at your time limit, but I can see you’re in a situation here so just… whenever is chill”

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          38 months ago

          This just reminded me of a good scene in the book The House in the Cerulean Sea. Minor spoiler, the character has a cat that chooses him.

    • credit crazy
      link
      fedilink
      258 months ago

      Perchance these competitions should have a points deducted by the animals quality of life. Of the poor thing has a hard time breathing -10 points idk

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      7
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Every one acts like every purebreed is a medical oddity when really it’s just an increased likelihood of defects for certain breeds. I can tell you right now any animal can hurt your pocket the second they decide your gold plated anal beads look like a tasty treat.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -18 months ago

              People dont have $50 a month. What ever what ever, no one should have a pet unless they can afford it and all the animals that can’t find homes should be put down.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                08 months ago

                You can get it as cheaply as $17 a month. And the person I was replying to said your pet would “hurt your pocket” when they eat something they’re not supposed to, implying that they would be paying for the expensive surgery. Most veterinary surgeries are $2K-$5k. Mid range health insurance is $50 per month or $600 per year, saving $1400- $4400 for a person who would be paying out of pocket otherwise.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -58 months ago

      Hmm two possible reasons come to mind. First, purebred in terms of cats and dogs not necessarily meaning genetic defects. Second, having a defined breed gives the judges something to rate against.

      • SharkEatingBreakfast
        link
        fedilink
        22
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I once was looking to get a cat and found the goofiest looking idiot on Craigslist. Turns out, it was a purebred Exotic Shorthair that was surrendered to a shelter because it didn’t look fucked-up enough (it could still kind of breathe through its nose). New owners wanted to recoup costs because they adopted another cat that was “more playful” and the exotic was getting eye-goop on their white carpets. A wonderful standard for purebreeds!

        I changed his name from “Luigi” to “Waluigi”, and he was best best buddy for many many years.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        208 months ago

        Not necessarily? More like by default. Purebreds are a thing because of certain genetic traits and are bred to not only maintain them, but to enhance those traits. Because of all that inbreeding the propensity for certain diseases and cancers are vastly increased. A purebred dog or cat will with near certainty be riddled with cancer or disease by the time they start getting a bit older. I love both cats and dogs, but purebreds shouldn’t be a thing.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          It’s the size of the population and the competence/goals of the breeders. Breeders chasing exaggerated traits at the expense of the animal’s health are the major problem.

          There are “pure” breeds of every domestic animal that are healthy – provided it’s a line not perpetuated by selfish idiots. Domestic shorthair cats, various working breeds of dogs, horses, etc.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -18 months ago

            I like how you put “pure” in quotes because the way they keep those lines healthy is by occasionally mixing in other breeds.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              No, it’s because I find the idea and the importance attached to it idiotic.

              Having said that, I also believe it doesn’t automatically mean a breed is inbred and/or has health problems.