@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 10 months agoWe don't judge here. :)mander.xyzimagemessage-square95arrow-up11.04Karrow-down147
arrow-up1993arrow-down1imageWe don't judge here. :)mander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 10 months agomessage-square95
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish7•10 months ago usually people consider mathematicians as scientists Yikes! … Wait, does this mean I can call a historian an artist? Then I’m game.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•10 months agoYou can call them whatever you want, what are they going to do? They’re historians!
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•10 months agoIn twenty years time they’ll rip into me on r/askhistorians
minus-squareoce 🐆linkfedilinkEnglish1•10 months agoHistorians are scientists imo. Is that a reference I don’t have?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•10 months agoUsually (in my experience?) history is one of the ‘humanities’, which are more lumped with arts than sciences.
minus-squareoce 🐆linkfedilinkEnglish1•10 months agoYes it usually is, but I think the methodologies for modern history research is very much scientific.
Yikes!
… Wait, does this mean I can call a historian an artist? Then I’m game.
You can call them whatever you want, what are they going to do? They’re historians!
In twenty years time they’ll rip into me on r/askhistorians
Historians are scientists imo. Is that a reference I don’t have?
Usually (in my experience?) history is one of the ‘humanities’, which are more lumped with arts than sciences.
Yes it usually is, but I think the methodologies for modern history research is very much scientific.