• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1010 months ago

    It sounds like you’re trying to apply reason to the perception of behaviour as masculine, feminine, straight or gay, and the perception of those categorisations as positive or negative.

    That is misguided :)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I’m just applying the same type of nonsensical stereotypes this group will display to show that this is gay behaviour too, and the entire discussion is moronic. I say this as a cishet guy that went to a boys school and heard all this nonsense regularly.

      Just clean up your shit - if that somehow leads you to discover your love of men, roll with it… you were almost certainly always gay, and that’s something to embrace not fear.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -210 months ago

        Yeah, but “applying the same type of stereotypes” is an example of trying to reason about this kind of thinking which can’t be done. You see a parallel between worrying about something silly like how you’re perceived for being green, and other stereotypically feminine behaviours - but prejudiced people don’t see or don’t care about that parallel.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          210 months ago

          Those prejudiced people aren’t likely to be browsing !/gay - my comments weren’t for their benefit.

          Do you think you’re having more success bringing prejudiced people around in here than I am, or do you think there might be reasons to post here that aren’t for the benefit of the prejudiced?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            110 months ago

            do you think there might be reasons to post here that aren’t for the benefit of the prejudiced?

            Sure, but I don’t know what you’re getting at.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              110 months ago

              If we’re not posting for the benefit of the prejudiced, there’s no particular need to…

              reason about this kind of thinking which can’t be done.

              …or worry that

              prejudiced people don’t see or don’t care about that parallel.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                110 months ago

                My understanding was exactly that you were reasoning about that kind of thinking - hence the start of that sentence, “It sounds like you’re trying to apply reason…” ;) If not I don’t understand your original comment!

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  110 months ago

                  More a case of applying their rationale to demonstrate that it’s not based in reason.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    110 months ago

                    Fair enough. It certainly isn’t - but I think it’s worth understanding and emphasising that prejudice is never based on reason.