@[email protected]M to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and [email protected]English • 2 years agoBiden wants network of 500,000 EV chargers. Two states are getting a head start. Ohio and Pennsylvania are leading the way in the completion of a more robust national charging networkwapo.stmessage-square30arrow-up1102
arrow-up197external-linkBiden wants network of 500,000 EV chargers. Two states are getting a head start. Ohio and Pennsylvania are leading the way in the completion of a more robust national charging networkwapo.st@[email protected]M to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and [email protected]English • 2 years agomessage-square30
minus-square@[email protected]OPMlinkfedilink19•2 years agoPublic chargers have two huge advantages: They provide someplace for people living in rental housing to charge They enable road trips The result of building them will be to shift some amount of transport away from burning fossil fuels.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•2 years agoby public, you mean like a gas station? a private business that serves the public or do you mean public like the interstate system is public? a public service funded by taxes
minus-square@[email protected]OPMlinkfedilink2•2 years agoMore like gas stations and toll roads. They’re not providing free-as-in-beer electricity
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-9•2 years agoThese are both edge cases and shouldn’t be the focus of policy. Straight up. Its a complete mistake to prioritize these as investments. We have a grid, the VAST majority of electric car owners have access to outlets, we should be focusing on grid level storage, not charging networks.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink13•2 years agoA third of Americans rent their home, that’s not an edge case.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-2•2 years agoRenting a home means you have access to a wall socket. Yes, those are edge cases.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•2 years agoYou’re out of touch, not just with where we are, but where we need to be.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink0•2 years agoAdding to charging networks is a waste of resources. We need battery storage at grid level. It’s more important and a higher priority.
Public chargers have two huge advantages:
The result of building them will be to shift some amount of transport away from burning fossil fuels.
by public, you mean like a gas station? a private business that serves the public
or do you mean public like the interstate system is public? a public service funded by taxes
More like gas stations and toll roads. They’re not providing free-as-in-beer electricity
These are both edge cases and shouldn’t be the focus of policy. Straight up. Its a complete mistake to prioritize these as investments.
We have a grid, the VAST majority of electric car owners have access to outlets, we should be focusing on grid level storage, not charging networks.
A third of Americans rent their home, that’s not an edge case.
Renting a home means you have access to a wall socket.
Yes, those are edge cases.
You’re out of touch, not just with where we are, but where we need to be.
Adding to charging networks is a waste of resources. We need battery storage at grid level. It’s more important and a higher priority.