BarterClubM to [email protected]English • 8 months agoFry cooksi.imgur.comimagemessage-square458arrow-up11.49Karrow-down135
arrow-up11.46Karrow-down1imageFry cooksi.imgur.comBarterClubM to [email protected]English • 8 months agomessage-square458
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•8 months agoIt’s not a strawman just because you miss the point so entirely.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish-1•edit-28 months agoYour point is that if you needed surgery, then you would want it performed other than by a cook with a dirty spatula. Your point is meaningless. No one suggested that someone performing surgery would not be properly trained.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•8 months agoThat wasn’t my point because i didn’t say that. I was explaining that the person who did was only describing how having more or less skill is true using that scenario.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•8 months agoSkill is not a quantity. You identified as a quantity duration of time invested training. You conflated an item with one of its attributes.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•edit-28 months agoYou can have a quantity of skill. Skill is not a requirement for justice, nor is it something that should be denied from workers.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•8 months agoSkill is not a quantity, nor is it quantifiable, and your further objection embodies a straw man attack.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•8 months agoDoes an apprentice in a trade have more skill or less in his trade than a master in another trade? Again, skills differ qualitatively. At best one may conceive as a quantity a particular kind of skill, but not skill generally.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•8 months agoOk, you concede skill can be quantified and compared. People can also have more skills than others. And, yes, generally.
It’s not a strawman just because you miss the point so entirely.
Your point is that if you needed surgery, then you would want it performed other than by a cook with a dirty spatula.
Your point is meaningless.
No one suggested that someone performing surgery would not be properly trained.
That wasn’t my point because i didn’t say that. I was explaining that the person who did was only describing how having more or less skill is true using that scenario.
Skill is not a quantity.
You identified as a quantity duration of time invested training.
You conflated an item with one of its attributes.
You can have a quantity of skill.
Skill is not a requirement for justice, nor is it something that should be denied from workers.
Skill is not a quantity, nor is it quantifiable, and your further objection embodies a straw man attack.
Apprentice, tradesman, journeyman, master.
Does an apprentice in a trade have more skill or less in his trade than a master in another trade?
Again, skills differ qualitatively.
At best one may conceive as a quantity a particular kind of skill, but not skill generally.
Ok, you concede skill can be quantified and compared. People can also have more skills than others. And, yes, generally.