@[email protected] to solarpunk [email protected] • 1 year agoreplace nuclear with hydroslrpnk.netimagemessage-square33arrow-up1140arrow-down136
arrow-up1104arrow-down1imagereplace nuclear with hydroslrpnk.net@[email protected] to solarpunk [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square33
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink0•11 months agoYes that’s true but that’s also not the point. The point is that we already have a problem and making it twice the size doesn’t make it twice as bad
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•11 months agoIt will take quite a while to double our spent fuel rods, and once we start using them for fuel we can tackle the rods faster than we produce them. In the meantime underground storage works just fine without harming people or the environment much.
Yes that’s true but that’s also not the point. The point is that we already have a problem and making it twice the size doesn’t make it twice as bad
It will take quite a while to double our spent fuel rods, and once we start using them for fuel we can tackle the rods faster than we produce them.
In the meantime underground storage works just fine without harming people or the environment much.