@[email protected] to solarpunk [email protected] • 1 year agoreplace nuclear with hydroslrpnk.netimagemessage-square33arrow-up1140arrow-down136
arrow-up1104arrow-down1imagereplace nuclear with hydroslrpnk.net@[email protected] to solarpunk [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square33
minus-square𝗧𝗼𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿 *𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑦 𝑝𝑢𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑑 𝑑𝑜𝑤𝑛linkfedilink4•1 year agoIf it requires a dam to be build in that area then for sure. However, there are some locations which can take advantage of the natural landscape such as Niagara falls.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-18•1 year agoNope hydro has many plus sides. Nuclear btw alters the environment more as the whole uranium mining process is very dirty…
Hydro alters environments, stick with nuclear.
If it requires a dam to be build in that area then for sure. However, there are some locations which can take advantage of the natural landscape such as Niagara falls.
Nope hydro has many plus sides.
Nuclear btw alters the environment more as the whole uranium mining process is very dirty…