@FUCKERM to internet [email protected]English • 1 year agoreminderlemmy.worldimagemessage-square189arrow-up11.77Karrow-down112
arrow-up11.76Karrow-down1imagereminderlemmy.world@FUCKERM to internet [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square189
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish-3•1 year agoLol that looks like 5 minutes of work to you?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year agoNo, a study that studies way more than what I described doesn’t look like 5 minutes of work to me, why would it?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•edit-21 year agoWhy would I? Why isn’t the study I’ve linked sufficient? Why do you want me to disprove something you should easily be able to prove, and that other people have already disproven?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish-2•1 year agoThe study you linked is behind a $40 paywall
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year ago Have you never heard of Sci-Hub or other services to circumvent such paywalls? As I said, more than enough people have made such studies. You could have easily figured out either of those if you were taking this conversation seriously. You obviously aren’t, so I’ll stop here.
Lol that looks like 5 minutes of work to you?
No, a study that studies way more than what I described doesn’t look like 5 minutes of work to me, why would it?
So you gonna spot me the $40?
Why would I? Why isn’t the study I’ve linked sufficient?
Why do you want me to disprove something you should easily be able to prove, and that other people have already disproven?
The study you linked is behind a $40 paywall
You could have easily figured out either of those if you were taking this conversation seriously. You obviously aren’t, so I’ll stop here.
So that’s a no on the $40?