@[email protected] to [email protected]English • edit-29 months agoSemantic arguments, part 2 (Hard Mode: No Pulaski... *and no Julian for lack of spots)lemmy.worldimagemessage-square38arrow-up193arrow-down13file-text
arrow-up190arrow-down1imageSemantic arguments, part 2 (Hard Mode: No Pulaski... *and no Julian for lack of spots)lemmy.world@[email protected] to [email protected]English • edit-29 months agomessage-square38file-text
minus-square@[email protected]OPlinkfedilinkEnglish11•edit-29 months agoYeah, him too. Look, I had 6 spots and several shows to cover. Not to mention his lack of ethics in dating his patients.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish7•9 months agoFair enough, I would have given any name that wasn’t on the list, I mean, Tom Paris was a doc for a short bit, right? (My collectors plate has it in a footnote)
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish6•9 months agoWell, if I was deemed a criminal by the act of existing, I wouldn’t care a lot about ethics either.
Yeah, him too. Look, I had 6 spots and several shows to cover. Not to mention his lack of ethics in dating his patients.
Fair enough, I would have given any name that wasn’t on the list, I mean, Tom Paris was a doc for a short bit, right? (My collectors plate has it in a footnote)
Field medic with basic training.
Inflammable means flammable? What a starship.
deleted by creator
Well, if I was deemed a criminal by the act of existing, I wouldn’t care a lot about ethics either.